- Archeological evidence suggest origins of first Americans by Kevin Tetter Everything that is accepted as fact regarding the first humans in North America isMessage 1 of 1 , Sep 6, 2010View SourceArcheological evidence suggest origins of 'first' Americansby Kevin TetterEverything that is accepted as fact regarding the first humans in North America is upon further evaluation, just theory. The explanations are full of probably, likely, accepted, and other terms that translate into a simple were not sure. Academics lap up these hypotheses and perpetuate it until evidence to the contrary is presented. Even then, there are those who cannot accept that what they may have believed for a lifetime may in fact, be false. A research team may have come up with evidence that may force the rewriting of history books currently accepted by academia.A perfectly preserved skull was found near Mexico City sometime in the 1950's. At that time, carbon dating techniques were primitive, and the age of skull could only be estimated. The technology today is much more advanced, and the skull is now accurately dated. The result was a bombshell that shook everything that was theorized about the settlement of North America. British scientists from Liverpools John Moores University and Oxfords Research Laboratory of Archaeology found that the skull was around 13,000 years old, at least 2000 years older than any other human remains found in North America. This would appear to debunk the theory that Mongoloids from the Asian continent walked here on what was the then frozen Bering Strait.
The skull, belonging to a 26 year old woman known as the Penon Woman, has a shape that typifies Caucasians. According to research team leader Dr. Silvia Gonzalez, the evidence points to the fact that indeed, (Caucasians) whites were the first humans in North America.
At the moment it points to that as being likely. They were definitely not Mongoloid in appearance. They were from somewhere else. As to whether they were 'European', at this point in time we cannot say no,
If this skull is indeed the oldest remain on the continent, it would prove the "Solutrean Hypothesis," the theory that 'Europeans' were the first humans to touch North America.
Academics and skeptics will attempt to discredit this particular theory, because it does not fall in line with what they have been taught and believe to be true. They may point to the fact that this is just a single skull. There are other scenarios that could disprove the Solutrean Hypothesis. Could this woman possibly have made the trip alone? That is an unlikely scenario, which brings up another possibility: That the skull was for some reason brought here later, and in fact the Penon Woman never made the trip on her own. It would stretch the boundaries of imagination, but since this is still theory, any explanation is possible. Another possibility is that over the course of thousands of years, any remains that existed earlier are either too poorly preserved to be identified, or were consumed over time.
Currently we have this single skull, and it is yet another theory regarding the first humans in North America. This theory is backed up by the Penon Woman though.