Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: ABH Re: The Great Pyramid

Expand Messages
  • lloyd barre
    No, the three maters only apply to the trigrammaton, not to all three letter Hebrew verbal forms. Lloyd ... [Non-text portions of this message have been
    Message 1 of 11 , May 7, 2013
    • 0 Attachment
      No, the three maters only apply to the trigrammaton, not to all three
      letter Hebrew verbal forms.

      Lloyd

      On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 8:22 AM, nu_cee <nuchamber@...> wrote:

      > **
      >
      >
      > Hello Lloyd,
      >
      > Given that the trigrammaton is a trine with a substituion pattern as you
      > aver, it reminded me of the possible vowel relation to the consonants,
      > "d(daleth), r(resh), and k(kaf)", since
      > ...this name "DRK" appears to be one of the key names of the Father.
      > ..."DRK" is a trine that fits within the threeness of the trigrammaton.
      > ..."DRK" as Hebrew summates "224" (4+200+20) that relates to Hebrew
      > Proverbs 3:5-6 that summates Hebrew "1568" or 7x 224. It is well known
      > that "1568" equals the sum of the Hebrew, Proverbs 3:5-6; "In all of
      > your ways, know me and I will straighten your path."
      >
      > Is there any such correlation in your knowledge?
      >
      > regards,
      > nucee/nuchamber
      >
      > --- In AncientBibleHistory@yahoogroups.com, lloyd barre wrote:
      > >
      > > What does this have to do with the Trigrammaton i a w=yhw?
      > >
      > > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:23 AM, nu_cee nuchamber@... wrote:
      > >
      > > > **
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > Hello Holly & group...
      > > >
      > > > Thanks for the correction... but what is your "derakeka"...?
      > > > how does that compare with "d(daleth), r(resh), and k(kaf)" ?
      > > >
      > > > regards,
      > > > nucee/nuchamber
      > > >
      > > > --- In AncientBibleHistory@yahoogroups.com, "Holly" wrote:
      > > > >
      > > > > Nucee:
      > > > >
      > > > > Your Proverbs citation is incorrect. Perhaps you meant 3:6? In
      > that
      > > > case the word is derakeka meaning 'your ways' in this context.
      > > > >
      > > > > Holly
      > > > >
      > > > > --- In AncientBibleHistory@yahoogroups.com, "nu_cee" nuchamber@
      > wrote:
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Hello Lloyd & group,
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Consistent with your presentation, Lloyd, can you find any
      > > > correlation
      > > > > > of vowels with this sequence of consonants: D (daleth), R
      > (resh), K
      > > > > > (kaf)... ?
      > > > > >
      > > > > > This name (DRK) appears to have relation to Proverbs 3:56 ?
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Does this sequence of letters have any relation to the
      > trigrammaton?
      > > > > >
      > > > > > regards,
      > > > > > nucee/nuchamber
      > > > > >
      > > > > > --- In AncientBibleHistory@yahoogroups.com, lloyd barre wrote:
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > The Trigrammaton is what we find in our earliest attestation
      > of
      > > > the
      > > > > > name of
      > > > > > > the Shasu god at Soleb. It is shown at the home page of this
      > > > forum.
      > > > > > It is
      > > > > > > read right to left. The two flags is yod, next is he and the
      > last
      > > > is
      > > > > > w=o,
      > > > > > > pronounce iao--no consonants.
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 10:55 AM, lloyd barre lmbarre@ wrote:
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > Ethel,
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > The original form was iao, a Trigrammaton, that became iaoa.
      > > > These
      > > > > > are
      > > > > > > > mater lexiones, Hebrew consonants used as vowels:
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > i=y
      > > > > > > > a=h
      > > > > > > > o=w
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > a=h
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > So yhw became yhwh
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:24 AM, ethels macnietspingal@:
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > >> **
      > > > > > > >>
      > > > > > > >>
      > > > > > > >>
      > > > > > > >> In fact, to understand the Olam of the Original Testament,
      > I
      > > > just
      > > > > > > >> discovered myself last night this on TV and here it is
      > > > available on
      > > > > > > >> youtube. Now each of us can understand the world of Moses
      > > > before
      > > > > > there
      > > > > > > >> was a Moses or Yahweh. Note: I'm using Yahweh now because
      > it
      > > > seems
      > > > > > to be
      > > > > > > >> acceptable worldwide by the latest scholarship. I prefer
      > > > Y'H'WaH
      > > > > > myself
      > > > > > > >> because I dig the beat of the sound with my own feet:)
      > > > > > > >>
      > > > > > > >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=re24x4gKbi8
      > > > > > > >> -ethel jks
      > > > > > > >>
      > > > > > > >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      > > > > > > >>
      > > > > > > >>
      > > > > > > >>
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      > > > > > >
      > > > > >
      > > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > >
      > >
      > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      > >
      >
      > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      >
      >
      >


      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.