Re: boortz.com: Nealz NuzeToday's Nuze
- Strange isn't it? That anyone would immediately question if Iraq was
behind 9/11? That was one of my first thoughts as it was happening.
We knew Saddam Hussein was financing killers to suicide-bomb innocent
Israeli citizens. Strange that any U.S. president would care enough
to ask that question himself? Strange isn't it that a U.S.
President would do something about terrorists killing Americans?
After 8 years of Clintoon's twiddling thumbs and sighing? We now
have a president who realizes Islamic terrorists have been warring
again us. Very strange indeed.=~!! Oh well ~~ if SkeeryKerry wins
this next election, our dimwits just might get their beloved Saddam
Hussein and bin Laden back in power.
# # #
--- In Americanemail@example.com, lefty480@w... wrote:
> The world-famous Internet site of the Nationally Syndicated Neal
> Show! Wed Mar 31 2004
> Today's Nuze
> Wednesday, March 31, 2004
> BOORTZ ON CNBC TONIGHT AT 8:45 EASTERN
> IRAQ WAS DISCUSSED ... AMAZING!
> Now here's a big shocker from yesterday. It seems that on the day
> after the September 11th Islamic terrorist attacks President Bush
> actually did ask Richard Clarke to check into any connection that
> might have had to the attacks. This is supposed to be all of the
> proof you need that Bush planned all along to invade Iraq and depose
> Saddam Hussein. Bush haters, I'm sure, will accept it as such.
> Try to consider the mind frame of the president on the day after the
> attacks. What did he know for sure? Well, for starters George Bush
> knew that:
> Iraq had invaded Iran.
> Iraq had invaded Kuwait.
> Iraq had killed tens of thousands of Iranians with chemical weapons.
> Iraq had killed well over ten thousand Iraqi Kurds with chemical
> Saddam Hussein was paying reward money to families of Palestinian
> suicide bombers who had killed Israelis.
> Saddam Hussein had murdered thousands of his own people.
> Saddam Hussein attempted to assassinate a former President of the
> Saddam Hussein had made no secret of his hatred for the United
> and his desire to deliver a decisive blow against the United States
> some manner.
> In short .. Saddam was a nasty man, and Iraq was an evil place.
> So .. no matter how much you may hate George Bush, and no matter how
> much you would like to see him defeated in September, can you
> any scenario under which the President would not ask a trusted
> to advise him as to whether or not Iraq might have been involved in
> September 11th attacks?
> In other words ... there's no story here.
> SO .. THE U.S. IS GOING TO "WEAPONIZE" SPACE
> We've also learned in the past day or so that a Pentagon agency has
> aside about $68 million to spend on something called the Near Field
> Infrared Experiment. This is an experiment in how to identify
> launched from the earth and, if need be, destroy them from space.
> Now it's that "destroy them from space" thing that is upsetting
> the left. The evil United States is going to (gasp!) "weaponize"
> space. We're actually going to place honest-to-goodness WEAPONS out
> OK, my illogical, fact-challenged friends. Look at it this way.
> is in space now. China isn't exactly what you would call a cuddly
> friend. Russia is in space also. So, that leaves three strong
> military powers with a presence in space. You can bet your bottom
> dollar that one of these countries is going to be the first to place
> weapons in orbit around the earth. Tell me ... which country do you
> want that to be? Would you prefer China to be the first with a
> weapons system in space? How about Russia? Me? I'm voting for
> us ... the good ole US of A. Like it or not, we're the good
> and I want us to have the edge -- not somebody who might use that
> against us.
> RELYING ON THE STUPIDITY OF THE GREAT AMERICAN VOTER
> One of the saddest aspects of this and so many other election years
> the degree to which politicians -- and I'm talking about both
> Republicans and Democrats -- rely on the stupidity and ignorance of
> American public. The more you watch these clowns the more convinced
> you are that they truly fear an informed electorate.
> This is particularly true among Democrats. Disagree all you want,
> Democratic politics is crafted to appeal to less educated
> The lower your level of educational achievement, the less you earn
> you enter the workforce. The less you earn the more likely it is
> you will vote for a Democrat.
> One thing that Democrats definitely rely on is the ignorance of
> Americans as to basic economics --- an ignorance that borders on
> obscene. This ignorance is the result of our reliance on government
> for educating our children. The natural imperative for any
> organization is to grow stronger. Institutions will not
> weaken themselves .. nor will the people who live or feed off those
> institutions. Government is no different. It wants to grow, and it
> will construct and direct every entity over which it has control to
> promote that growth. This goes for government schools. Students
> who learn of the dynamic nature of capitalism and free enterprise
> seek more economic freedom and less government economic
> Students who learn that allowing people to keep more of what they
> will actually spur economic growth will fight higher taxes.
> who learn that 80% of new jobs in our economy are generated by small
> businesses, not large corporations, will seek government policies
> are favorable to small businesses, not policies that punish them.
> Politicians understand the consequences of an economically literate
> voter base. That's why they rally to the defense of government
> education. It protects them.
> Now ... let's discuss a specific politician ... The man of the
> John Kerry. If you want a good example of a politician exploiting
> ignorance of the American people, you got just that at a gas
> San Diego yesterday. The media says that sKerry made
> stop" at this gas station. I have a question for the media: If this
> stop was unscheduled, why were there a hundred supporters waiting
> Kerry at that particular gas station? Oh well .... let's continue.
> There was John Kerry -- at that gas station -- blaming the current
> gasoline prices on none other than George Bush and Dick Cheney.
> knows that people are upset with these prices .. and he also knows
> these government-educated voters have no clear idea why these
> high right now.
> What would the well-educated voter know? Well ... here's a partial
> list of the reasons for high gas prices.
> There is a higher demand for gas in the U.S. American consumers are
> using more gas this year than they have in many previous years, even
> with the high prices.
> Environmental regulations lower the supply base of gasoline
> consumers. Oil refineries have to switch production at this time of
> year to boutique gas blends for specific geographical regions. This
> means that if there is a shortage driving prices up in one region
> supplies can't be shipped in from another region to meet demand ...
> wrong blend.
> We have about one-half the number of oil refineries in the United
> that we had 30 years ago. The last time a new refinery opened for
> business was in 1976.
> There is an unexpected high demand for petroleum in China. Some
> that China may be buying huge supplies to build a strategic reserve.
> Saudi Arabia has cut production. There is speculation that Saudi
> Arabia is recognizing that its reserves of crude oil are running
> Saudi production may never again reach previous highs.
> The gas prices we face right now are not record high prices. In the
> early 1980s a gallon of gasoline cost about $2.90. That's adjusted
> for inflation, of course, but so is your income. Tough for
> school graduates to understand, I know.
> Now .. if you are a consumer aware of the foregoing facts, how
> it that you're going to nod your head in agreement when John Heinz
> starts blaming Bush for the current high prices?
> An educated voter is not John Kerry's friend.
> Another area where Democrats rely on voter ignorance is in the area
> jobs. John Kerry loves to talk about all of these jobs being
> shifted overseas and how he is going to punish all of
> Arnold CEOs" who are overseeing the decimation of the American
> workplace. Could Kerry get away with this if the voters knew:
> From 1993 to 2002 the U.S. economy created a total of 17.8 million
> jobs. During that time 310 million jobs were eliminated, and 328
> million jobs were created.
> The new jobs being created are not "hamburger flipper" jobs. The
> Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that between 2002 and 2012
> management positions in business, finance and other professions will
> grow from 43.2 million to 52 million. That's a 20 percent
> increase. These professional positions will go from 30 percent of
> total employment to 31.5 percent. That's not flipping hamburgers.
> "Offshoring" jobs has actually contributed to job and economic
> growth. Take computers, for instance. A recent study by the Cato
> Institute shows that the offshoring of computer-related
> jobs has accounted for a reduction in computer prices in the U.S.
> much as 30%. This means that more small businesses can afford these
> computers, and larger businesses can afford more of them. This
> to more jobs and increased productivity. Estimates are that this
> rapid spread of computer use has added $230 billion to our GDP.
> Now ... if more Americans were truly clued-in as to what is
> our jobs picture, do you think sKerry could get away with his
> rhetoric? Not a chance. Again ... the uneducated voter is Kerry's
> Are you beginning to see why it is so important to so many
> that our system of government non-education be preserved?
> WHAT'S ANOTHER SIX BILLION? WHO'S COUNTING ANYWAY?
> The Republican-controlled U.S. Senate has voted to add $6 billion in
> spending for child welfare for welfare brood mares. The vote was
> 78-20. Not even close. Thirty one Republicans voted for it.
> Irresponsible people have children they can't afford .. the
> steps forward to take care of them ... and the small percentage of
> responsible people who actually pay taxes foot the bill.
> This is harsh, I know, but if a woman can't care for a child she
> into this world then the state child welfare agencies should simply
> declare that child to be abused and remove it from that household.
> Foster care, orphanages, adoption ... whatever it takes .. but stop
> writing checks to these life-support systems for ovaries.
> FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE WORRIED ABOUT MAKING TERRORISTS MAD
> This will tell you everything you need to know about the way the
> administration handled terrorism as compared to how President Bush
> doing it. Former Secretary of State Madeline Albright, in a speech
> the Yale Divinity School yesterday, said she is concerned that
> Bush is fueling the hatred of terrorist organizations. There you
> the basic difference: instead of saying that the Islamic terrorists
> to be destroyed, she is worried about hurting their feelings. After
> all, Osama may just need a little counseling, you know.
> Madeline Albright ... preaching appeasement.
> According to Albright: "From the beginning, the president had made
> clear that we are at war with terrorists and not with Islam." But
> we? Isn't it more than just a coincidence that all of these
> are members of the "peaceful" religion of Islam? Everybody loves to
> tiptoe around this notion that Islamic terrorists have nothing to do
> with Islam. Somehow we are supposed to separate the two. Muslims
> an image problem here.
> She also said the she believed as the Bush administration did, that
> Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. We'll see how
> that gets reported.
> Don't hold your breath.
> THE OUTSOURCING BOOGEYMAN IS BACK
> Here we go again...get ready for the onslaught of pro-Kerry sob
> about outsourcing. Secretary of the Treasury John Snow argued in an
> interview published yesterday that outsourcing ultimately helps the
> economy. Snow said that outsourcing "is a part of trade...and there
> can't be any doubt about the fact that it makes the economy
> Of course, he's absolutely right. Now since a lot of you seem to
> think otherwise, how about a brief economics lesson.
> Imagine if you went into a store...any store will do...and you
> buy a widget. Hanging on the store shelf were two identical widgets
> the same quality and workmanship. As a matter of fact, you can't
> the difference except that on one label it says made in the USA and
> the other it says made in China. Why...you'll buy the American made
> one, right? Sure...but wait...the one made in China costs half the
> price...which one are you going to buy?
> Another example...you sign up for a credit card. The credit card
> company offers you a choice: if you have a problem, you get to
> customer service center based in the United States, or one based in
> India. If you chose the outsourced one, your interest rate is
> 3 points. Which one would you chose? That's right...most people
> chose to save the money.
> So enough whining about outsourcing. Your quest for lower prices is
> what's driving this situation.
> IMAGINE IF THIS WERE A REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT...
> Documents obtained using the Freedom of Information act show that
> President Bill Clinton ignored the genocide that was going on in
> and knew about it before and as it was happening. According to
> declassified documents, the Clinton administration buried the
> information to justify its inaction. Officials were already
> using the word genocide within days of the start of the killings,
> said nothing publicly because Clinton chose not to intervene. It
> the death squads three months to murder 800,000 people.
> Now, the US had no interests in Rwanda, so the policy of not
> may have been right, but where is the Congressional Black Caucus on
> one? What if this were President Bush instead? We would never hear
> the end of it. Can you imagine? It would be the top story in the
> news media for days on end, with the president being accused of
> and racism for his inaction. Liberals would be calling for not only
> impeachment, but probably war crimes trials. Just envision the
> speeches on floor of the House and Senate. The left would be
> the White House with pitchforks.
> Remember this the next time someone tells you there's no bias in the
> READING ASSIGNMENTS
> Tony Blankley says that the Kerry campaign has all the makings of a
> classic flop. What fun!
> Walter E. Williams looks at a phenomenon that is driving up gas
> minimum price laws. Independent gas station owners are whining
> unfair competition from the big boys.
> Earlier this week I told you about a group of protestors that
> Karl Rove at his private residence ... pounding on windows and
> Here's the Wall Street Journal's take on this event.
> Rebecca Hagelin talks about the hole Congress is digging with
> and greater federal spending, and gives some ideas for getting out
> Bill Murchison says hindsight is 20/20 in Washington DC, and reminds
> people worried about Richard Clarke and the 9/11 Commission that we
> actually still at war.
> Would you really like to do something to hurt our economy? Try
> restrictions on outsourcing.
> John Kerry claims President Bush should be doing more with OPEC to
> gas prices, but the Cato Institute's Jerry Taylor writes that OPEC
> friend of ours, and that consumers would actually be better off if
> disappeared entirely.
> A British soccer league wants to stop reporting losing scores so as
> to hurt the children's feelings. This is the ultimate political
> correctness from the self-esteem police. Kids need to learn early
> that there are winners and losers in life.
> Mort Kondracke says that to voters, President Bush's 2 1/2 years of
> decisive action after 9/11 will trump any concerns they have about
> 1/2 months he was in office beforehand.
> Michael Jackson paid a visit to Congress yesterday to talk with
> lawmakers about his upcoming trip to Africa. However, he was
> by the Congressional Black Caucus. Apparently Jackson isn't black
> enough anymore.
> According to the media it might as well be the Second Coming, but
> their cherished liberal talk radio network goes on the air with 5
> stations. That's right....five stations. Good luck...they're going
> need it.
> I'm sure Fox News Channel is quaking in their boots...Al Gore and
> partner, former TV lawyer Joel Hyatt, are set to close a deal buying
> their own cable channel. Apparently he's going to start his own
> TV network to compete with CNN.
> The media is beside themselves as to how Bush's polling numbers are
> increasing. Must be the "attack ads," they insist. How about the
> people find out about John Kerry, the less interested they are in
> him president?
> BOORTZ BLAST NEWSLETTER
> Everyone is talking about the Boortz Blast newsletter. Do you want
> yours? Sign up here and we'll deliver it directly to your inbox
> weeks. If you signed up but aren't receiving it, either your
> your spam filter could be keeping it from you. Try using a personal
> email address and check your spam filter's junk folder for wayward
> NEAL'S FANS GET TOGETHER
> If you like Neal and are looking for like minded people to hang out
> online or off, check out these places:
> Talkmaster Yahoo Group
> Meet Boortz fans in your area
> alt.fan.neal.boortz newsgroup (note, you're going to have to figure
> newsgroups all on your own)
> NEALZ LINKS FOR NUZE
> The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
> World Net Daily
> Wall Street Journal opinions
> Washington Times
> Washington Post
> Real Clear Politics
> Media Research Center
> Naples Daily News
> The Drudge Report
> The Associated Press
> SF Gate
> Belinda Skelton, Ken Rogers, Laura Nunemaker and Brian Ganey assist
> the daily preparation of Nealz Nuze!