Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Genetically Engineered crops to be Deregulated Even More-contact legisdlators

Expand Messages
  • arnoldgore@aol.com
    (http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/) Could GE Crop Regulations Be Any Weaker? Surprising as it may seem, the answer could be “yes!” In the waning months
    Message 1 of 1 , Mar 1, 2009
      Could GE Crop Regulations Be Any Weaker?
      Surprising as it may seem, the answer could be “yes!”

      In the waning months of the Bush Administration, the U.S. Department of
      Agriculture (USDA) released a proposal to completely overhaul its regulation of
      genetically engineered crops, significantly weakening its oversight. No
      longer would USDA start from the assumption that a new GE crop must be
      regulated; and some could be exempted altogether. The proposed rule would virtually
      ensure that contamination of organic and conventional crops will become even
      more frequent, and even excuses the Agency from taking any action to remedy
      such contamination. And, the rule would continue to allow the dangerous
      practice of producing drugs and industrial chemicals in food crops grown in the
      open environment. In short, if implemented, the proposed rule would allow
      the wholesale deregulation of the agricultural biotechnology industry.

      Over four years ago, USDA promised stricter oversight of genetically
      engineered crops; unfortunately, improvements considered early-on have vanished and
      the regulations have instead become weaker. The proposed rule now has even
      more gaping holes than the regulations it is replacing, and creates a few
      new ones as well, resulting in more public exposure to untested and unlabeled
      genetically engineered foods. Instead of tightening controls to protect
      the public and the environment from contamination and harm, what USDA has
      offered further endangers the public’s right to choose the foods families eat
      and farmers’ right to their chosen livelihoods.

      To make matters worse, USDA published the rule before publishing the full
      Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), as required by law, and in the absence
      of public review of the data needed to make regulatory recommendations.
      Clearly, there is something wrong with this picture. We are calling on the
      Obama Administration to reject the irresponsible Bush “anything goes” biotech
      policy. And we are requesting a moratorium on commercial planting of any new
      GE crops until comprehensive regulations are in place.

      The good news is that USDA has reopened the comment period on the proposed
      rule and we are seizing this opportunity to ask the new Administration to
      take a fresh look at how GE crops are regulated. We urge our supporters to
      join us in demanding that the Agency release the EIS for public comment before
      it proceeds with any further rule-making or GE crop approvals. Public
      comments are being accepted through March 17, 2009.

      Tell USDA to: (1) Withdraw the proposed rule; (2) Release the EIS for
      public review and comment and to be used as a basis for further rule-making; and
      (3) Suspend all new GE crop approvals until the above has been satisfactorily
      completed and unless and until GE crops are proven safe.
      The USDA does not have to listen to your complaints.
      Make a copy of the Letter using Select and Copy, and Email your Congressman
      and Senators-each state has 2. Ask them to Contact the Chairman of the
      Agriculture Committee to ask the USDA to stop this remnant of Bush Era

      Send a letter to the following decision maker(s):
      Docket No. APHIS-2008-0023
      Below is the sample letter:
      Subject: Docket No. APHIS-2008-0023
      Dear [decision maker name automatically inserted here],
      Docket No. APHIS-2008-0023
      Regulatory Analysis and Development
      PPD, APHIS, Station 3A-03.8
      4700 River Road Unit 118
      Riverdale, MD 20737-1238.

      Re: Docket No. APHIS-2008-0023, Importation, Interstate Movement, and
      Release into the Environment of Certain Genetically Engineered Organisms.

      I am very concerned about the risks posed by genetically engineered
      crops--especially those crops engineered to withstand repeated applications of
      herbicides and crops that produce drugs and industrial chemicals. They threaten
      human health, family farmers, wildlife, and the environment. I urge USDA to
      withdraw the proposed rule, publish the Environmental Impact Statement, and
      suspend all new GE crop approvals in the interim.

      After USDA releases the EIS, a comment period of at least 90 days is needed
      so the public has the opportunity to fully participate in a transparent
      process on this important issue. This will not only aid in the development of t
      he final EIS but also in the drafting of a new proposed rule. The current
      proposed rule does little to close the loopholes in the regulations the rule is
      designed to replace and it creates more gaps than it fills. For example:
      As currently proposed, the rule allows biotech companies to self-assess the
      safety of their own experimental GE crops to determine whether USDA should
      even regulate them. The proposed criteria are open-ended, subjective, and
      would substantially reduce USDA?s oversight of a wide range of GE crops. Most
      egregiously, it is not genetic engineering that triggers regulation under the
      rule, it is the determination that the technology "poses a potential plant
      pest risk" and it is the developer that makes that initial decision. This is a
      clear abdication of regulatory responsibility by USDA.

      The proposed rule would also allow companies to grow some GE crops with no
      oversight whatsoever. Under the proposed "tiered system," USDA could
      eliminate entire categories of GE crops or varieties with which they have
      "familiarity," despite the USDA?s acknowledgement that doing so would "increase gene
      flow between GE and non-GE crops." This policy virtually ensures that
      contaminatio n episodes will become more frequent. To add insult to injury, USDA has
      proposed to include a "Low Level Presence" policy in the law which excuses
      it from taking any action to remove experimental GE crop material from
      conventional or organic food, feed, and seed. Experience shows that such
      contamination often causes severe economic harm to farmers, and could threaten the
      environment as well. Further, USDA's proposal of "Conditional Exclusion" wrongly
      enables developers to obtain exemptions from permit requirements without
      publication, notice, or public comment. This unfairly limits transparency and
      blocks the public from participation in important decisions that affect
      public health, the environment, and the economy.

      Despite repeated assurances that pharmaceutical and industrial GE crops
      would be subjected to increased monitoring, reporting, oversight, and
      management, USDA rejected scientifically-sound options that would have banned outdoor
      cultivation of GE phar maceutical- and chemical-producing food crops. This is
      the only way to ensure that untested drugs and industrial chemicals don't
      end up in our food. It also ignores the strong support such protective action
      enjoys from citizens and the food industry. USDA has also refused to propose
      any controls on pesticide-promoting GE crops, despite documented increases
      in pesticide use caused by herbicide-tolerant crops and an epidemic of
      resistant weeds that have been fostered by these crops.

      Finally, the rule includes language that bars state or local regulation of
      GE crops that are more protective than its own weak rule. I strongly oppose
      such preemptive language that would bar local or state authorities from
      putting meaningful regulations or restrictions on GE crops in place that best suit
      their communities.

      In sum, I urge you to: (1) Withdraw the proposed rule; (2) Release the EIS
      for public review and comment, and to be used as a basis for further
      rule-making; and (3 ) Suspend all new GE crop approvals until the above has been
      satisfactorily completed and unless and until GE crops are proven safe.

      Arnold Gore

      (http://ga3.org/campaign/APHIS2/3bixekn4oj5i6bi3?) Take Action!
      _Click here to take action_
      (http://ga3.org/campaign/APHIS2/3bixekn4oj5i6bi3?) on this issue
      Visit the web address below to tell your friends about this.
      _Tell-a-Friend!_ (http://ga3.org/campaign/APHIS2/forward/3bixekn4oj5i6bi3?)
      What's At Stake:
      To read our substantive, organizational comments from the previous comment
      period _CLICK HERE_
      The full text of the USDA APHIS proposed rule, Docket No. APHIS-2008-0023,
      can be found _HERE_

      Campaign Expiration Date:
      March 17, 2009

      If you received this message from a friend, you can _sign up for Center for
      Food Safety_ (http://ga3.org/cfs/join.html?r=_7r_E91atXGtE) .
      This message was sent to arnoldgore@.... Visit your _subscription
      management page_ (http://ga3.org/cfs/smp.tcl?nkey=3bixekn4oj5i6bi3&) to modify your
      email communication preferences or update your personal profile. To stop ALL
      email from Center for Food Safety, click to _remove_
      (http://ga3.org/cfs/remove-domain-direct.tcl?ctx=center&nkey=3bixekn4oj5i6bi3&) yourself from our
      lists (or reply via email with "remove or unsubscribe" in the subject line).
      **************You're invited to Hollywood's biggest party: Get Oscars
      updates, red carpet pics and more at Moviefone.

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.