Re: A question Re Fusion Power and suggestion for Global Green Energy Day Etc?
- You are still lying to people about water as fuel. What can you possibly get from lying?
Most of your post here is nonsense. Water is the result of hydrogen and oxygen bonding. There is no further reaction available between those two elements.
--- In All-Energy@yahoogroups.com, "s1r9a9m9" <s1r9a9m9@...> wrote:
> I would like to read the paper that you have written about my work not being as I had stated. It should make for some good reading. Science has things that are strange that do work. I have never stated that water has any chemical explosive actions of its own. It is a known fact that water is a storage of two gases
Water is not a storage of two gases.
( a battery of sorts ) that when separated dose have an explosive nature when recombined with a static charge. I have only added a stronger static charge to the water so that a reaction takes place with out separating it first.
Adding energy to water can turn it to steam or seperate the bond but when seperating the bond there is energy loss, not gain.
Nothing new to science there ether. Water dose become volatile at a vacuum point where a charge can be added to cause a reaction between the two gases in a way that avalanches the reaction through the water and vapor during the reaction.
Nothing new here ether, (lighting). Thunder is the rebound effect of the reaction.
> If any one has any information on this please step in. I can only be wrong or right. The piston in the engine is what changes the atmospheric conditions in the cylinder for the reaction to take place when the static charge is fired by the spark plug.
> A rant only brings out truth of concept.
> Thank you.
> I think this is taking up space on this group and I will not be as another person is and argue about any tech that I have worked on. There are better things to learn on this group than one persons rant about others.
> --- In All-Energy@yahoogroups.com, "waynegage2000" <waynegage@> wrote:
> > I said you should be held accountable for your lies. You claim that you ran a car on water which is a lie. You claim that water is a chemical fuel. That is a lie. You have wasted the time and money of countless people with your lies.
> > Some people are up in arms with the false belief that oil companies are suppressing water technology. This is nonsense.
> > Charles Couch is just this side of going postal because of your nonsense. He may be the dumbest person to ever walk upright but you are not helping.
> > Your a useless piece of work without ethics and morals.
> > Those interested, s1r has a discussion group "WaterFuel1978".
> > Any real science is discouraged.
> > --- In All-Energy@yahoogroups.com, "s1r9a9m9" <s1r9a9m9@> wrote:
> > >
> > > No mention was made of using this on vehicles. This is a small reactor that builds up pressure inside and is released through a pipe to turn a flywheel to make electrical power. It can feed it self with the right generator head turning. Steam power under lower pressure and temp. This is not new tech.
> > > I am accountable for my work, when I sale some thing that uses this tech I stand behind it 100%. OH wait I have never sold any thing that uses this tech I have only given the information out for free. If some one builds it for them self should I be held responsible for their work? I have nothing to offer for sale to any one.
> > > This ant nano tech, its some thing that is easy to work with. And its not my work that has proven the tech is useful, but others that are still working to produce power for less expense to people who need it world wide. That is why big corporations are getting into it as well.
> > >
> > > I thank you for your concerns for others. I think they can do things for them selves, and do good work at that.
> > >
> > > And I have destroied what?
> > >
> > > Nathren,