Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

DRAFT AWEIA Code of Ethics

Expand Messages
  • dave santos
      Dear AWE practitioner,   The following DRAFT Code of Ethics for AWEIA (& AWE generally) is based on that of the American Institute of Professional
    Message 1 of 4 , Nov 8, 2010
       
      Dear AWE practitioner,
       
      The following DRAFT Code of Ethics for AWEIA (& AWE generally) is based on that of the American Institute of Professional Geologists. Please review & offer suggestions to best tailor this to AWE. The document will be a working text subject to member ratification & ongoing amendment. Thanks to John Oyebanji, President Pro Tem of AWEIA, for encouragement in this effort.
       
      It is hoped that AWE players who embrace these standards will enjoy a credibility & competative advantage over those who do not,
       
      dave santos
      KiteLab Group
      AWEIA Member
       
      Cc: John Oyebanji
       

      (October 5, 2003)
       
      PREAMBLE
      Members of the Airborne Wind Energy (AWE) Industry Association (AWEIA) are dedicated to the highest standards of personal integrity and professional conduct. The Associations’s Code of Ethics comprises three parts: the Canons, which are broad principles of conduct; the Ethical Standards, which are goals to which Members aspire; and the Rules of Conduct. Compliance with the Rules of Conduct is mandatory and violation of any Rule will be grounds for disciplinary action by the Association. Under the Bylaws, the Institute may also impose discipline for legal violations and because of the suspension or revocation of registration or licensure, among other grounds. Disciplinary action may take the form of private admonition, public reprimand, suspension of membership, or termination. The Code of Ethics applies to all professional activities of Members and Adjuncts, wherever and whenever they occur. The title “Member” where used in this Code of Ethics shall include Adjuncts. A Member shall not be relieved of an ethical responsibility by virtue of his or her employment, because the Member has delegated an assignment to a subordinate, or because the Member was not involved in performing services for compensation.
      CANON 1. General Obligations
      Members should be guided by the highest standards of personal integrity and professional conduct.
      STANDARD 1.1
      Members should pursue honesty, integrity, loyalty, fairness, impartiality, candor, fidelity to trust, inviolability of confidence, and honorable conduct as a way of life.
      Rule 1.1.1 By applying for or by continuing Membership in the Association, a Member agrees to comply with and uphold this Code of Ethics.
      CANON 2. Obligations To The Public
      Members should uphold the public health, safety, and welfare in the performance of professional services, and avoid even the appearance of impropriety.
      STANDARD 2.1
      Members should observe and comply with the requirements and intent of all applicable laws, codes, and regulations.
      Rule 2.1.1 A Member shall not knowingly participate in harmful activities such as AWE environmental abuse or militarization, or knowingly permit the development of such purposes.
      Rule 2.1.2 A Member shall neither offer nor make any illegal payment, gift, or other valuable consideration to a public official for the purpose of influencing a decision by such official; nor shall a Member accept any payment, gift, or other valuable consideration that would appear to influence a decision made on behalf of the public by the Member acting in a position of public trust.
      Rule 2.1.3 If a Member becomes aware of a decision or action by an employer, client, or colleague which violates any law or regulation, the Member shall advise against such action, and when such violation appears to materially affect the public health, safety, or welfare, shall advise the appropriate public officials responsible for the enforcement of such law or regulation.
      STANDARD 2.2
      Members should be accurate, truthful, and candid in all communications with the public.
      Rule 2.2.1 A Member shall not knowingly engage in false or deceptive advertising, or make false, misleading, or deceptive representations or claims in regard to the AWE profession or which concern his or her own professional qualifications or abilities or those of other technologists.
      Rule 2.2.2 A Member shall not issue a false statement or false information which the Member knows to be false or misleading, even though directed to do so by an employer or client.
      Rule 2.2.3 A Member shall avoid making sensational, exaggerated, and or unwarranted statements that may mislead or deceive members of the public or any public body.
      STANDARD 2.3
      Members should participate as citizens and as professionals in public affairs.
      Rule 2.3.1 A Member acting in a position of public trust shall exercise his or her authority impartially, and shall not seek to use his or her authority for personal profit or to secure any competitive advantage.
      STANDARD 2.4
      Members should promote public awareness of the effects of AWE on the quality of life.
      CANON 3. Obligations To Employers And Clients
      Members should serve their employers and clients faithfully and competently within their overall professional and ethical obligations.
      STANDARD 3.1
      Members should disclose any actual or potential conflicts of interest that may affect their ability to serve an employer or client faithfully.
      Rule 3.1.1 A Member shall disclose to a prospective client the existence of any owned or controlled AWE investment or other interest that may, either directly or indirectly, have a pertinent bearing on such employment.
      Rule 3.1.2 A Member having or expecting to have beneficial interest in a property on which the Member reports shall state in the report the fact of the existence of such interest or expected interest.
      Rule 3.1.3 A Member employed or retained by one employer or client shall not accept, without that employer’s or client’s written consent, an engagement by another if the interests of the two are in any manner conflicting.
      STANDARD 3.2
      Members should protect, to the fullest possible extent, the interest of an employer or client so far as is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare and the Member’s legal, professional, and ethical obligations.
      Rule 3.2.1 A Member shall not use, directly or indirectly, any confidential information obtained from or in the course of performing services for an employer or client in any way which is adverse or detrimental to the interests of the employer or client, except with the prior consent of the employer or client or when disclosure is required by law.
      Rule 3.2.2 A Member who has made an investigation for an employer or client shall not seek to profit economically from the information gained without written permission of the employer or client, unless it is clear that there can no longer be a conflict of interest with the original employer or client.
      Rule 3.2.3 A Member shall not use his or her employer’s or client’s resources for private gain without the prior knowledge and consent of his or her employer or client.
      STANDARD 3.3
      Members should serve their employers and clients competently.
      Rule 3.3.1 A Member shall perform professional services or issue professional advice that is only within the scope of the education and experience of the Member and the Member’s professional associates, consultants, or employees, and shall advise the employer or client if any professional advice is outside of the Member’s personal expertise.
      Rule 3.3.2 A Member shall not give a professional opinion or submit a report without being as thoroughly informed as might be reasonably expected, considering the purpose for which the opinion or report is requested.
      Rule 3.3.3 A Member shall engage, or advise an employer or client to engage, and cooperate with other experts and specialists whenever the employer’s or client’s interests would be best served by such service.
      STANDARD 3.4
      Members should serve their employers and clients diligently and perform their services in a timely manner.
      STANDARD 3.5
      Members who find that obligations to an employer or client conflict with professional or ethical standards should have such objectionable conditions corrected or resign.
      CANON 4. Obligations to Professional Colleagues
      Members should respect the rights, interests, and contributions of their professional colleagues.
      STANDARD 4.1
      Members should respect and acknowledge the professional status and contributions of their colleagues.
      Rule 4.1.1 A Member shall give due credit for work done by others in the course of a professional assignment, and shall not knowingly accept credit due another.
      Rule 4.1.2 A Member shall not plagiarize another in oral and written communications, or use materials prepared by others without appropriate attribution.
      STANDARD 4.2
      Members should be accurate, truthful, and candid in all communications with others regarding professional colleagues.
      Rule 4.2.1. A Member shall not issue (a) false statement(s), (a) misleading statement(s), or (a) sensational, exaggerated, defamatory, and or unwarranted statement(s) regarding a professional colleague. Differences of opinion occur and statements regarding opinions should be restricted to and based on logical and scientific principles and should be made in a respectful and professional manner.
      CANON 5. Obligations to the Institute and the Profession
      Members should continually strive to improve the AWE profession so that it may be of ever increasing benefit to society.
      STANDARD 5.1
      Members should strive to improve their professional knowledge and skills.
      STANDARD 5.2
      Members should cooperate with others in the profession and encourage the dissemination of geological knowledge.
      STANDARD 5.3
      Members should work toward the improvement of standards of geological education, research, training, and practice.
      STANDARD 5.4
      Members should not only uphold these standards of ethics by precept and example but also encourage by counsel and advice to other Members, their adherence to such standards.
      STANDARD 5.5
      Members having knowledge of a violation of these Rules by another Member should bring substantiated evidence of such violation to the attention of the Institute.


       

    • spacecannon@san.rr.com
      Was there something supposed to be attached here or are you implying our code of ethics is to be blank.
      Message 2 of 4 , Nov 8, 2010
        Was there something supposed to be attached here or are you implying our code of ethics is to be blank.




        ---- dave santos <santos137@...> wrote:
        >  
        > Dear AWE practitioner,
        >  
        > The following DRAFT Code of Ethics for AWEIA (& AWE generally) is based on that of the American Institute of Professional Geologists. Please review & offer suggestions to best tailor this to AWE. The document will be a working text subject to member ratification & ongoing amendment. Thanks to John Oyebanji, President Pro Tem of AWEIA, for encouragement in this effort.
        >  
        > It is hoped that AWE players who embrace these standards will enjoy a credibility & competative advantage over those who do not,
        >  
        > dave santos
        > KiteLab Group
        > AWEIA Member
        >  
        > Cc: John Oyebanji 
        >  
        > (October 5, 2003)
        >  
        > PREAMBLE
        > Members of the Airborne Wind Energy (AWE) Industry Association (AWEIA) are dedicated to the highest standards of personal integrity and professional conduct. The Associations’s Code of Ethics comprises three parts: the Canons, which are broad principles of conduct; the Ethical Standards, which are goals to which Members aspire; and the Rules of Conduct. Compliance with the Rules of Conduct is mandatory and violation of any Rule will be grounds for disciplinary action by the Association. Under the Bylaws, the Institute may also impose discipline for legal violations and because of the suspension or revocation of registration or licensure, among other grounds. Disciplinary action may take the form of private admonition, public reprimand, suspension of membership, or termination. The Code of Ethics applies to all professional activities of Members and Adjuncts, wherever and whenever they occur. The title “Member” where used in this Code of Ethics
        > shall include Adjuncts. A Member shall not be relieved of an ethical responsibility by virtue of his or her employment, because the Member has delegated an assignment to a subordinate, or because the Member was not involved in performing services for compensation.
        > CANON 1. General Obligations
        > Members should be guided by the highest standards of personal integrity and professional conduct.
        > STANDARD 1.1
        > Members should pursue honesty, integrity, loyalty, fairness, impartiality, candor, fidelity to trust, inviolability of confidence, and honorable conduct as a way of life.
        > Rule 1.1.1 By applying for or by continuing Membership in the Association, a Member agrees to comply with and uphold this Code of Ethics.
        > CANON 2. Obligations To The Public
        > Members should uphold the public health, safety, and welfare in the performance of professional services, and avoid even the appearance of impropriety.
        > STANDARD 2.1
        > Members should observe and comply with the requirements and intent of all applicable laws, codes, and regulations.
        > Rule 2.1.1 A Member shall not knowingly participate in harmful activities such as AWE environmental abuse or militarization, or knowingly permit the development of such purposes.
        > Rule 2.1.2 A Member shall neither offer nor make any illegal payment, gift, or other valuable consideration to a public official for the purpose of influencing a decision by such official; nor shall a Member accept any payment, gift, or other valuable consideration that would appear to influence a decision made on behalf of the public by the Member acting in a position of public trust.
        > Rule 2.1.3 If a Member becomes aware of a decision or action by an employer, client, or colleague which violates any law or regulation, the Member shall advise against such action, and when such violation appears to materially affect the public health, safety, or welfare, shall advise the appropriate public officials responsible for the enforcement of such law or regulation.
        > STANDARD 2.2
        > Members should be accurate, truthful, and candid in all communications with the public.
        > Rule 2.2.1 A Member shall not knowingly engage in false or deceptive advertising, or make false, misleading, or deceptive representations or claims in regard to the AWE profession or which concern his or her own professional qualifications or abilities or those of other technologists.
        > Rule 2.2.2 A Member shall not issue a false statement or false information which the Member knows to be false or misleading, even though directed to do so by an employer or client.
        > Rule 2.2.3 A Member shall avoid making sensational, exaggerated, and or unwarranted statements that may mislead or deceive members of the public or any public body.
        > STANDARD 2.3
        > Members should participate as citizens and as professionals in public affairs.
        > Rule 2.3.1 A Member acting in a position of public trust shall exercise his or her authority impartially, and shall not seek to use his or her authority for personal profit or to secure any competitive advantage.
        > STANDARD 2.4
        > Members should promote public awareness of the effects of AWE on the quality of life.
        > CANON 3. Obligations To Employers And Clients
        > Members should serve their employers and clients faithfully and competently within their overall professional and ethical obligations.
        > STANDARD 3.1
        > Members should disclose any actual or potential conflicts of interest that may affect their ability to serve an employer or client faithfully.
        > Rule 3.1.1 A Member shall disclose to a prospective client the existence of any owned or controlled AWE investment or other interest that may, either directly or indirectly, have a pertinent bearing on such employment.
        > Rule 3.1.2 A Member having or expecting to have beneficial interest in a property on which the Member reports shall state in the report the fact of the existence of such interest or expected interest.
        > Rule 3.1.3 A Member employed or retained by one employer or client shall not accept, without that employer’s or client’s written consent, an engagement by another if the interests of the two are in any manner conflicting.
        > STANDARD 3.2
        > Members should protect, to the fullest possible extent, the interest of an employer or client so far as is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare and the Member’s legal, professional, and ethical obligations.
        > Rule 3.2.1 A Member shall not use, directly or indirectly, any confidential information obtained from or in the course of performing services for an employer or client in any way which is adverse or detrimental to the interests of the employer or client, except with the prior consent of the employer or client or when disclosure is required by law.
        > Rule 3.2.2 A Member who has made an investigation for an employer or client shall not seek to profit economically from the information gained without written permission of the employer or client, unless it is clear that there can no longer be a conflict of interest with the original employer or client.
        > Rule 3.2.3 A Member shall not use his or her employer’s or client’s resources for private gain without the prior knowledge and consent of his or her employer or client.
        > STANDARD 3.3
        > Members should serve their employers and clients competently.
        > Rule 3.3.1 A Member shall perform professional services or issue professional advice that is only within the scope of the education and experience of the Member and the Member’s professional associates, consultants, or employees, and shall advise the employer or client if any professional advice is outside of the Member’s personal expertise.
        > Rule 3.3.2 A Member shall not give a professional opinion or submit a report without being as thoroughly informed as might be reasonably expected, considering the purpose for which the opinion or report is requested.
        > Rule 3.3.3 A Member shall engage, or advise an employer or client to engage, and cooperate with other experts and specialists whenever the employer’s or client’s interests would be best served by such service.
        > STANDARD 3.4
        > Members should serve their employers and clients diligently and perform their services in a timely manner.
        > STANDARD 3.5
        > Members who find that obligations to an employer or client conflict with professional or ethical standards should have such objectionable conditions corrected or resign.
        > CANON 4. Obligations to Professional Colleagues
        > Members should respect the rights, interests, and contributions of their professional colleagues.
        > STANDARD 4.1
        > Members should respect and acknowledge the professional status and contributions of their colleagues.
        > Rule 4.1.1 A Member shall give due credit for work done by others in the course of a professional assignment, and shall not knowingly accept credit due another.
        > Rule 4.1.2 A Member shall not plagiarize another in oral and written communications, or use materials prepared by others without appropriate attribution.
        > STANDARD 4.2
        > Members should be accurate, truthful, and candid in all communications with others regarding professional colleagues.
        > Rule 4.2.1. A Member shall not issue (a) false statement(s), (a) misleading statement(s), or (a) sensational, exaggerated, defamatory, and or unwarranted statement(s) regarding a professional colleague. Differences of opinion occur and statements regarding opinions should be restricted to and based on logical and scientific principles and should be made in a respectful and professional manner.
        > CANON 5. Obligations to the Institute and the Profession
        > Members should continually strive to improve the AWE profession so that it may be of ever increasing benefit to society.
        > STANDARD 5.1
        > Members should strive to improve their professional knowledge and skills.
        > STANDARD 5.2
        > Members should cooperate with others in the profession and encourage the dissemination of geological knowledge.
        > STANDARD 5.3
        > Members should work toward the improvement of standards of geological education, research, training, and practice.
        > STANDARD 5.4
        > Members should not only uphold these standards of ethics by precept and example but also encourage by counsel and advice to other Members, their adherence to such standards.
        > STANDARD 5.5
        > Members having knowledge of a violation of these Rules by another Member should bring substantiated evidence of such violation to the attention of the Institute.
        >
        >
        >
      • dave santos
        Lynn s objections are duly noted & can be voted as amendments.   The DRAFT AWE Ethics Code is not plagiarized (what a funny irony that would be). The model
        Message 3 of 4 , Nov 10, 2010
          Lynn's objections are duly noted & can be voted as amendments.
          Ethics Codes do not fit every situation, but are living documents subject to debate about, say, what "environmental abuse" is. The Draft does not mention Global Warming, so if its all a false alarm the Code can stand as written. Perhaps changing "militarization" to "weaponization" comes closer to concensus on that point.
           
          The DRAFT AWE Ethics Code is not plagiarized (what a funny irony that would be). The model is openly attributed & modified in a spirit of good-will, fair-use, & creative-commons. Should the American Institute of Professional Geologists object on copyright grounds, let's cooperate. They likely will be flattered.
           

          Thanks to Lynn for catching the two vestigal geology mentions. 
           
          Any other suggestions or objections out there?

          From: Bob Stuart <bobstuart@...>
          To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
          Cc:
          Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 1:13:51 PM
          Subject: Re: [AWECS] DRAFT AWEIA Code of Ethics

           
          Ninety-seven percent of scientists think that global warming is a very serious reality, despite the easy money available to skeptics.  http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/11/hundreds-scientists-plan-rhetorical-assault-climate-skeptics/?utm_source=Raw+Story+Daily+Update&utm_campaign=d4606534f6-Nov9Newsletter11_9_2010&utm_medium=email

          I vote for keeping Provision 2.1.1, if only to discourage membership by people who imagine sinister plots arising from clear evidence, such as melting glaciers.  I assume that such persons are projecting their own ethics onto others.  Let's not have them spoiling our credibility.

          Bob Stuart

          On 10-Nov-10, at 12:09 PM, spacecannon@... wrote:

          Dave,
          I tellin ya the draft didnt show up until you replied. Moot point..

          I OBJECT TO PROVISION 2.1.1, THIS PROVISION IS VAGUE AND COULD BE USED INAPPROPRIATLY. For example I feel the CO2 thing is a false relgion an Im persuing to manufacture a coal burning car.
          The global warming belief is a big argument and does not apply to cannons of ethics.

          I OBJECT TO PROVISIONS 5.2 AND 5.3, DID YOU GUYS PLAGERIZE THIS OR GET PERMISSION TO USE THIS FROM THE GEOLOGY SOCIETY?

          Lynn

          ---- dave santos <santos137@...> wrote: 
          > the draft was on the reply you sent (check below)
           
          Its vital to debate ethics openly, as an American core value. In places like North Korea & Iran such debate is absent.
           
          Thank you for providing the militarist voice, as AWEC's members cowardly pose as neolibs, by ducking debate.
           
          We are mainly debating for elitist Euros to judge which Americans are "good guys". 
           
          AWE R & D will likely be centered in EU & we can partner if our core values line up.

          From: "spacecannon@..." <spacecannon@...>
          To: dave santos <santos137@...>
          Cc: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
          Sent: Tuesday, November 9, 2010 8:58:52 PM
          Subject: Re: Fw: [AWECS] DRAFT AWEIA Code of Ethics

          Dave, the draft was not at the bottom of the email I received, thats why I asked.  Do you really want to start this argument again?  This pacifist liberal progressive bend is nowhere man.  Humans dont naturally operate that way, and socialism doesnt work.  You would think the greenies would understand natural selection and how only the strong survive.  Wake up, "good guys" is relative to the side you are on, what do you think other countries think of when they think of who the good guys are?  Do the Iranians think we are the good guys or do they have some one else in mind? 

          Im not saying war is good or that innocents dont die in war, but I would rather be on the winning side even if it means dropping the bomb like in WW2.  Figure out which side you are on then back them even if it leaves a bad taste in your mouth, cause winning in war is a lot better than loosing.
          Lynn

          ---- dave santos <santos137@...> wrote: 
          > Lynn,
           
          The draft was right there at the bottom of the message. This note sent off-forum, since yours is a non-kite related question.
           
          You will probably once again object to the global anti-militarization AWE ethic, so keep in mind that modern armies average about a 20-to-one kill ratio over *noncombatants*, & tyrannical govts & terrorists will abuse lethal kite tech imitated from "good guys".
           
          There is easy military R & D taxpayer money available (like WindLift's million) without fighting AWEIA's proposed ethics. AWEC is the military-industrial investor group, with no ethics barrier.
           
          d

          ----- Forwarded Message -----
          From: "spacecannon@..." <spacecannon@...>
          To: 
          Cc: dave santos <santos137@...>
          Sent: Monday, November 8, 2010 11:02:32 PM
          Subject: Re: [AWECS] DRAFT AWEIA Code of Ethics

          Was there something supposed to be attached here or are you implying our code of ethics is to be blank.

          ---- dave santos <santos137@...> wrote: 
          >  
          > Dear AWE practitioner,
          >  
          > The following DRAFT Code of Ethics for AWEIA (& AWE generally) is based on that of the American Institute of Professional Geologists. Please review & offer suggestions to best tailor this to AWE. The document will be a working text subject to member ratification & ongoing amendment. Thanks to John Oyebanji, President Pro Tem of AWEIA, for encouragement in this effort.
          >  
          > It is hoped that AWE players who embrace these standards will enjoy a credibility & competative advantage over those who do not,
          >  
          > dave santos
          > KiteLab Group
          > AWEIA Member
          >  
          > Cc: John Oyebanji 
          >  
          > (October 5, 2003)
          >  
          > PREAMBLE
          > Members of the Airborne Wind Energy (AWE) Industry Association (AWEIA) are dedicated to the highest standards of personal integrity and professional conduct. The Associations’s Code of Ethics comprises three parts: the Canons, which are broad principles of conduct; the Ethical Standards, which are goals to which Members aspire; and the Rules of Conduct. Compliance with the Rules of Conduct is mandatory and violation of any Rule will be grounds for disciplinary action by the Association. Under the Bylaws, the Institute may also impose discipline for legal violations and because of the suspension or revocation of registration or licensure, among other grounds. Disciplinary action may take the form of private admonition, public reprimand, suspension of membership, or termination. The Code of Ethics applies to all professional activities of Members and Adjuncts, wherever and whenever they occur. The title “Member” where used in this Code of Ethics
          >  shall include Adjuncts. A Member shall not be relieved of an ethical responsibility by virtue of his or her employment, because the Member has delegated an assignment to a subordinate, or because the Member was not involved in performing services for compensation.
          > CANON 1. General Obligations
          > Members should be guided by the highest standards of personal integrity and professional conduct.
          > STANDARD 1.1
          > Members should pursue honesty, integrity, loyalty, fairness, impartiality, candor, fidelity to trust, inviolability of confidence, and honorable conduct as a way of life.
          > Rule 1.1.1 By applying for or by continuing Membership in the Association, a Member agrees to comply with and uphold this Code of Ethics.
          > CANON 2. Obligations To The Public
          > Members should uphold the public health, safety, and welfare in the performance of professional services, and avoid even the appearance of impropriety.
          > STANDARD 2.1
          > Members should observe and comply with the requirements and intent of all applicable laws, codes, and regulations.
          > Rule 2.1.1 A Member shall not knowingly participate in harmful activities such as AWE environmental abuse or militarization, or knowingly permit the development of such purposes.
          > Rule 2.1.2 A Member shall neither offer nor make any illegal payment, gift, or other valuable consideration to a public official for the purpose of influencing a decision by such official; nor shall a Member accept any payment, gift, or other valuable consideration that would appear to influence a decision made on behalf of the public by the Member acting in a position of public trust.
          > Rule 2.1.3 If a Member becomes aware of a decision or action by an employer, client, or colleague which violates any law or regulation, the Member shall advise against such action, and when such violation appears to materially affect the public health, safety, or welfare, shall advise the appropriate public officials responsible for the enforcement of such law or regulation.
          > STANDARD 2.2
          > Members should be accurate, truthful, and candid in all communications with the public.
          > Rule 2.2.1 A Member shall not knowingly engage in false or deceptive advertising, or make false, misleading, or deceptive representations or claims in regard to the AWE profession or which concern his or her own professional qualifications or abilities or those of other technologists.
          > Rule 2.2.2 A Member shall not issue a false statement or false information which the Member knows to be false or misleading, even though directed to do so by an employer or client.
          > Rule 2.2.3 A Member shall avoid making sensational, exaggerated, and or unwarranted statements that may mislead or deceive members of the public or any public body.
          > STANDARD 2.3
          > Members should participate as citizens and as professionals in public affairs.
          > Rule 2.3.1 A Member acting in a position of public trust shall exercise his or her authority impartially, and shall not seek to use his or her authority for personal profit or to secure any competitive advantage.
          > STANDARD 2.4
          > Members should promote public awareness of the effects of AWE on the quality of life.
          > CANON 3. Obligations To Employers And Clients
          > Members should serve their employers and clients faithfully and competently within their overall professional and ethical obligations.
          > STANDARD 3.1
          > Members should disclose any actual or potential conflicts of interest that may affect their ability to serve an employer or client faithfully.
          > Rule 3.1.1 A Member shall disclose to a prospective client the existence of any owned or controlled AWE investment or other interest that may, either directly or indirectly, have a pertinent bearing on such employment.
          > Rule 3.1.2 A Member having or expecting to have beneficial interest in a property on which the Member reports shall state in the report the fact of the existence of such interest or expected interest.
          > Rule 3.1.3 A Member employed or retained by one employer or client shall not accept, without that employer’s or client’s written consent, an engagement by another if the interests of the two are in any manner conflicting.
          > STANDARD 3.2
          > Members should protect, to the fullest possible extent, the interest of an employer or client so far as is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare and the Member’s legal, professional, and ethical obligations.
          > Rule 3.2.1 A Member shall not use, directly or indirectly, any confidential information obtained from or in the course of performing services for an employer or client in any way which is adverse or detrimental to the interests of the employer or client, except with the prior consent of the employer or client or when disclosure is required by law.
          > Rule 3.2.2 A Member who has made an investigation for an employer or client shall not seek to profit economically from the information gained without written permission of the employer or client, unless it is clear that there can no longer be a conflict of interest with the original employer or client.
          > Rule 3.2.3 A Member shall not use his or her employer’s or client’s resources for private gain without the prior knowledge and consent of his or her employer or client.
          > STANDARD 3.3
          > Members should serve their employers and clients competently.
          > Rule 3.3.1 A Member shall perform professional services or issue professional advice that is only within the scope of the education and experience of the Member and the Member’s professional associates, consultants, or employees, and shall advise the employer or client if any professional advice is outside of the Member’s personal expertise.
          > Rule 3.3.2 A Member shall not give a professional opinion or submit a report without being as thoroughly informed as might be reasonably expected, considering the purpose for which the opinion or report is requested.
          > Rule 3.3.3 A Member shall engage, or advise an employer or client to engage, and cooperate with other experts and specialists whenever the employer’s or client’s interests would be best served by such service.
          > STANDARD 3.4
          > Members should serve their employers and clients diligently and perform their services in a timely manner.
          > STANDARD 3.5
          > Members who find that obligations to an employer or client conflict with professional or ethical standards should have such objectionable conditions corrected or resign.
          > CANON 4. Obligations to Professional Colleagues
          > Members should respect the rights, interests, and contributions of their professional colleagues.
          > STANDARD 4.1
          > Members should respect and acknowledge the professional status and contributions of their colleagues.
          > Rule 4.1.1 A Member shall give due credit for work done by others in the course of a professional assignment, and shall not knowingly accept credit due another.
          > Rule 4.1.2 A Member shall not plagiarize another in oral and written communications, or use materials prepared by others without appropriate attribution.
          > STANDARD 4.2
          > Members should be accurate, truthful, and candid in all communications with others regarding professional colleagues.
          > Rule 4.2.1. A Member shall not issue (a) false statement(s), (a) misleading statement(s), or (a) sensational, exaggerated, defamatory, and or unwarranted statement(s) regarding a professional colleague. Differences of opinion occur and statements regarding opinions should be restricted to and based on logical and scientific principles and should be made in a respectful and professional manner.
          > CANON 5. Obligations to the Institute and the Profession
          > Members should continually strive to improve the AWE profession so that it may be of ever increasing benefit to society.
          > STANDARD 5.1
          > Members should strive to improve their professional knowledge and skills.
          > STANDARD 5.2
          > Members should cooperate with others in the profession and encourage the dissemination of geological knowledge.
          > STANDARD 5.3
          > Members should work toward the improvement of standards of geological education, research, training, and practice.
          > STANDARD 5.4
          > Members should not only uphold these standards of ethics by precept and example but also encourage by counsel and advice to other Members, their adherence to such standards.
          > STANDARD 5.5
          > Members having knowledge of a violation of these Rules by another Member should bring substantiated evidence of such violation to the attention of the Institute.
          > 
          > 
          >      





        • spacecannon@san.rr.com
          Ok Dave, your fairness and parlimentary openness is is is ... changing my opinion of you in a good way, crap. Lynn
          Message 4 of 4 , Nov 10, 2010
            Ok Dave, your fairness and parlimentary openness is is is ... changing my opinion of you in a good way, crap.
            Lynn



            ---- dave santos <santos137@...> wrote:
            > Lynn's objections are duly noted & can be voted as amendments.
            >  
            > The DRAFT AWE Ethics Code is not plagiarized (what a funny irony that would be). The model is openly attributed & modified in a spirit of good-will, fair-use, & creative-commons. Should the American Institute of Professional Geologists object on copyright grounds, let's cooperate. They likely will be flattered.
            >  
            > Plagiarism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
            >
            > Thanks to Lynn for catching the two vestigal geology mentions. 
            >  
            > Any other suggestions or objections out there?
            >
            >
            > From: Bob Stuart <bobstuart@...>
            > To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
            > Cc:
            > Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 1:13:51 PM
            > Subject: Re: [AWECS] DRAFT AWEIA Code of Ethics
            >
            >
            >  
            > Ninety-seven percent of scientists think that global warming is a very serious reality, despite the easy money available to skeptics.  http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/11/hundreds-scientists-plan-rhetorical-assault-climate-skeptics/?utm_source=Raw+Story+Daily+Update&utm_campaign=d4606534f6-Nov9Newsletter11_9_2010&utm_medium=email
            >
            > I vote for keeping Provision 2.1.1, if only to discourage membership by people who imagine sinister plots arising from clear evidence, such as melting glaciers.  I assume that such persons are projecting their own ethics onto others.  Let's not have them spoiling our credibility.
            >
            > Bob Stuart
            >
            >
            > On 10-Nov-10, at 12:09 PM, spacecannon@... wrote:
            >
            > Dave,
            > >I tellin ya the draft didnt show up until you replied. Moot point..
            > >
            > >I OBJECT TO PROVISION 2.1.1, THIS PROVISION IS VAGUE AND COULD BE USED INAPPROPRIATLY. For example I feel the CO2 thing is a false relgion an Im persuing to manufacture a coal burning car.
            > >The global warming belief is a big argument and does not apply to cannons of ethics.
            > >
            > >I OBJECT TO PROVISIONS 5.2 AND 5.3, DID YOU GUYS PLAGERIZE THIS OR GET PERMISSION TO USE THIS FROM THE GEOLOGY SOCIETY?
            > >
            > >Lynn
            > >
            > >---- dave santos <santos137@...> wrote: 
            > >> the draft was on the reply you sent (check below)
            > > 
            > >Its vital to debate ethics openly, as an American core value. In places like North Korea & Iran such debate is absent.
            > > 
            > >Thank you for providing the militarist voice, as AWEC's members cowardly pose as neolibs, by ducking debate.
            > > 
            > >We are mainly debating for elitist Euros to judge which Americans are "good guys". 
            > > 
            > >AWE R & D will likely be centered in EU & we can partner if our core values line up.
            > >
            > >From: "spacecannon@..." <spacecannon@...>
            > >To: dave santos <santos137@...>
            > >Cc: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
            > >Sent: Tuesday, November 9, 2010 8:58:52 PM
            > >Subject: Re: Fw: [AWECS] DRAFT AWEIA Code of Ethics
            > >
            > >Dave, the draft was not at the bottom of the email I received, thats why I asked.  Do you really want to start this argument again?  This pacifist liberal progressive bend is nowhere man.  Humans dont naturally operate that way, and socialism doesnt work.  You would think the greenies would understand natural selection and how only the strong survive.  Wake up, "good guys" is relative to the side you are on, what do you think other countries think of when they think of who the good guys are?  Do the Iranians think we are the good guys or do they have some one else in mind? 
            > >
            > >Im not saying war is good or that innocents dont die in war, but I would rather be on the winning side even if it means dropping the bomb like in WW2.  Figure out which side you are on then back them even if it leaves a bad taste in your mouth, cause winning in war is a lot better than loosing.
            > >Lynn
            > >
            > >---- dave santos <santos137@...> wrote: 
            > >> Lynn,
            > > 
            > >The draft was right there at the bottom of the message. This note sent off-forum, since yours is a non-kite related question.
            > > 
            > >You will probably once again object to the global anti-militarization AWE ethic, so keep in mind that modern armies average about a 20-to-one kill ratio over *noncombatants*, & tyrannical govts & terrorists will abuse lethal kite tech imitated from "good guys".
            > > 
            > >There is easy military R & D taxpayer money available (like WindLift's million) without fighting AWEIA's proposed ethics. AWEC is the military-industrial investor group, with no ethics barrier.
            > > 
            > >d
            > >
            > >----- Forwarded Message -----
            > >From: "spacecannon@..." <spacecannon@...>
            > >To: 
            > >Cc: dave santos <santos137@...>
            > >Sent: Monday, November 8, 2010 11:02:32 PM
            > >Subject: Re: [AWECS] DRAFT AWEIA Code of Ethics
            > >
            > >Was there something supposed to be attached here or are you implying our code of ethics is to be blank.
            > >
            > >---- dave santos <santos137@...> wrote: 
            > >>  
            > >> Dear AWE practitioner,
            > >>  
            > >> The following DRAFT Code of Ethics for AWEIA (& AWE generally) is based on that of the American Institute of Professional Geologists. Please review & offer suggestions to best tailor this to AWE. The document will be a working text subject to member ratification & ongoing amendment. Thanks to John Oyebanji, President Pro Tem of AWEIA, for encouragement in this effort.
            > >>  
            > >> It is hoped that AWE players who embrace these standards will enjoy a credibility & competative advantage over those who do not,
            > >>  
            > >> dave santos
            > >> KiteLab Group
            > >> AWEIA Member
            > >>  
            > >> Cc: John Oyebanji 
            > >>  
            > >> (October 5, 2003)
            > >>  
            > >> PREAMBLE
            > >> Members of the Airborne Wind Energy (AWE) Industry Association (AWEIA) are dedicated to the highest standards of personal integrity and professional conduct. The Associations’s Code of Ethics comprises three parts: the Canons, which are broad principles of conduct; the Ethical Standards, which are goals to which Members aspire; and the Rules of Conduct. Compliance with the Rules of Conduct is mandatory and violation of any Rule will be grounds for disciplinary action by the Association. Under the Bylaws, the Institute may also impose discipline for legal violations and because of the suspension or revocation of registration or licensure, among other grounds. Disciplinary action may take the form of private admonition, public reprimand, suspension of membership, or termination. The Code of Ethics applies to all professional activities of Members and Adjuncts, wherever and whenever they occur. The title “Member” where used in this Code of Ethics
            > >>  shall include Adjuncts. A Member shall not be relieved of an ethical responsibility by virtue of his or her employment, because the Member has delegated an assignment to a subordinate, or because the Member was not involved in performing services for compensation.
            > >> CANON 1. General Obligations
            > >> Members should be guided by the highest standards of personal integrity and professional conduct.
            > >> STANDARD 1.1
            > >> Members should pursue honesty, integrity, loyalty, fairness, impartiality, candor, fidelity to trust, inviolability of confidence, and honorable conduct as a way of life.
            > >> Rule 1.1.1 By applying for or by continuing Membership in the Association, a Member agrees to comply with and uphold this Code of Ethics.
            > >> CANON 2. Obligations To The Public
            > >> Members should uphold the public health, safety, and welfare in the performance of professional services, and avoid even the appearance of impropriety.
            > >> STANDARD 2.1
            > >> Members should observe and comply with the requirements and intent of all applicable laws, codes, and regulations.
            > >> Rule 2.1.1 A Member shall not knowingly participate in harmful activities such as AWE environmental abuse or militarization, or knowingly permit the development of such purposes.
            > >> Rule 2.1.2 A Member shall neither offer nor make any illegal payment, gift, or other valuable consideration to a public official for the purpose of influencing a decision by such official; nor shall a Member accept any payment, gift, or other valuable consideration that would appear to influence a decision made on behalf of the public by the Member acting in a position of public trust.
            > >> Rule 2.1.3 If a Member becomes aware of a decision or action by an employer, client, or colleague which violates any law or regulation, the Member shall advise against such action, and when such violation appears to materially affect the public health, safety, or welfare, shall advise the appropriate public officials responsible for the enforcement of such law or regulation.
            > >> STANDARD 2.2
            > >> Members should be accurate, truthful, and candid in all communications with the public.
            > >> Rule 2.2.1 A Member shall not knowingly engage in false or deceptive advertising, or make false, misleading, or deceptive representations or claims in regard to the AWE profession or which concern his or her own professional qualifications or abilities or those of other technologists.
            > >> Rule 2.2.2 A Member shall not issue a false statement or false information which the Member knows to be false or misleading, even though directed to do so by an employer or client.
            > >> Rule 2.2.3 A Member shall avoid making sensational, exaggerated, and or unwarranted statements that may mislead or deceive members of the public or any public body.
            > >> STANDARD 2.3
            > >> Members should participate as citizens and as professionals in public affairs.
            > >> Rule 2.3.1 A Member acting in a position of public trust shall exercise his or her authority impartially, and shall not seek to use his or her authority for personal profit or to secure any competitive advantage.
            > >> STANDARD 2.4
            > >> Members should promote public awareness of the effects of AWE on the quality of life.
            > >> CANON 3. Obligations To Employers And Clients
            > >> Members should serve their employers and clients faithfully and competently within their overall professional and ethical obligations.
            > >> STANDARD 3.1
            > >> Members should disclose any actual or potential conflicts of interest that may affect their ability to serve an employer or client faithfully.
            > >> Rule 3.1.1 A Member shall disclose to a prospective client the existence of any owned or controlled AWE investment or other interest that may, either directly or indirectly, have a pertinent bearing on such employment.
            > >> Rule 3.1.2 A Member having or expecting to have beneficial interest in a property on which the Member reports shall state in the report the fact of the existence of such interest or expected interest.
            > >> Rule 3.1.3 A Member employed or retained by one employer or client shall not accept, without that employer’s or client’s written consent, an engagement by another if the interests of the two are in any manner conflicting.
            > >> STANDARD 3.2
            > >> Members should protect, to the fullest possible extent, the interest of an employer or client so far as is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare and the Member’s legal, professional, and ethical obligations.
            > >> Rule 3.2.1 A Member shall not use, directly or indirectly, any confidential information obtained from or in the course of performing services for an employer or client in any way which is adverse or detrimental to the interests of the employer or client, except with the prior consent of the employer or client or when disclosure is required by law.
            > >> Rule 3.2.2 A Member who has made an investigation for an employer or client shall not seek to profit economically from the information gained without written permission of the employer or client, unless it is clear that there can no longer be a conflict of interest with the original employer or client.
            > >> Rule 3.2.3 A Member shall not use his or her employer’s or client’s resources for private gain without the prior knowledge and consent of his or her employer or client.
            > >> STANDARD 3.3
            > >> Members should serve their employers and clients competently.
            > >> Rule 3.3.1 A Member shall perform professional services or issue professional advice that is only within the scope of the education and experience of the Member and the Member’s professional associates, consultants, or employees, and shall advise the employer or client if any professional advice is outside of the Member’s personal expertise.
            > >> Rule 3.3.2 A Member shall not give a professional opinion or submit a report without being as thoroughly informed as might be reasonably expected, considering the purpose for which the opinion or report is requested.
            > >> Rule 3.3.3 A Member shall engage, or advise an employer or client to engage, and cooperate with other experts and specialists whenever the employer’s or client’s interests would be best served by such service.
            > >> STANDARD 3.4
            > >> Members should serve their employers and clients diligently and perform their services in a timely manner.
            > >> STANDARD 3.5
            > >> Members who find that obligations to an employer or client conflict with professional or ethical standards should have such objectionable conditions corrected or resign.
            > >> CANON 4. Obligations to Professional Colleagues
            > >> Members should respect the rights, interests, and contributions of their professional colleagues.
            > >> STANDARD 4.1
            > >> Members should respect and acknowledge the professional status and contributions of their colleagues.
            > >> Rule 4.1.1 A Member shall give due credit for work done by others in the course of a professional assignment, and shall not knowingly accept credit due another.
            > >> Rule 4.1.2 A Member shall not plagiarize another in oral and written communications, or use materials prepared by others without appropriate attribution.
            > >> STANDARD 4.2
            > >> Members should be accurate, truthful, and candid in all communications with others regarding professional colleagues.
            > >> Rule 4.2.1. A Member shall not issue (a) false statement(s), (a) misleading statement(s), or (a) sensational, exaggerated, defamatory, and or unwarranted statement(s) regarding a professional colleague. Differences of opinion occur and statements regarding opinions should be restricted to and based on logical and scientific principles and should be made in a respectful and professional manner.
            > >> CANON 5. Obligations to the Institute and the Profession
            > >> Members should continually strive to improve the AWE profession so that it may be of ever increasing benefit to society.
            > >> STANDARD 5.1
            > >> Members should strive to improve their professional knowledge and skills.
            > >> STANDARD 5.2
            > >> Members should cooperate with others in the profession and encourage the dissemination of geological knowledge.
            > >> STANDARD 5.3
            > >> Members should work toward the improvement of standards of geological education, research, training, and practice.
            > >> STANDARD 5.4
            > >> Members should not only uphold these standards of ethics by precept and example but also encourage by counsel and advice to other Members, their adherence to such standards.
            > >> STANDARD 5.5
            > >> Members having knowledge of a violation of these Rules by another Member should bring substantiated evidence of such violation to the attention of the Institute.
            > >> 
            > >> 
            > >>      
            > >
            > >
            >
            >
            >
            > Ethics Codes do not fit every situation, but are living documents subject to debate about, say, what "environmental abuse" is. The Draft does not mention Global Warming, so if its all a false alarm the Code can stand as written. Perhaps changing "militarization" to "weaponization" comes closer to concensus on that point.
            >
            >
            >
          Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.