- Evelyn, Great! Good for you. When you read it please think deep into AAFA and outside the box. Let us hear of any ideas or any questions and pleaseMessage 1 of 10 , Jun 11, 2013View SourceEvelyn,Great! Good for you.When you read it please think deep into AAFA and "outside the box." Let us hear of any ideas or any questions and please do so here at About Alfords just in case someone else gets interested.The June issue will be a bit different in that we plan to have less text and more links, but are not sure how successful that will be.GilFrom: BEN MISTICH <eczm827@...>
To: "About_Alfords@yahoogroups.com" <About_Alfords@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: [About_Alfords] Revised May 2013 Newsletter - Different
Gil,I have printed mine. It looks great. Haven't had a chance to read it yet, but the index looks interesting.EvelynFrom: Gil Alford <gilalford@...>
To: "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>; "About_Alfords@..." <About_Alfords@...>
Sent: Friday, June 7, 2013 4:09 PM
Subject: [About_Alfords] Revised May 2013 Newsletter - Different
Well,Here it is. I know some of you have been waiting for it with heated breath!!Please!! At least crack it open and take a look at it. Not only does it look different -- it IS different.This is done for you - the members of the association - and in the long run - for the association.YOU can change things if you have the right ideas and you make them known. Sound off so the leadership (not me) can hear them. But, you get it to me and I'll get it to the leaders.After I sent that messed up version the last day of May - within just a couple of days I heard from sixteen of you. In most cases I got the impression that you had read the email that transmitted the newsletter but had not looked at the attachment. I'll be responding to all of these, if I have not done so already --- but in most cases the response will be sent to or through About_Alfords. If I don't hear from you then I will just assume that you did not receive this email and the attachment.We would appreciate it if you would respond to About_Alfords rather than to the olnl newsletter address. To assist in that I am sending a copy of this to About_Alfords so maybe you'll find it easier to reply via that.On the 2nd page of the attached we talk about changes in format of future issues and the size attachments that might be involved. The attached is 674KB. Unfortunately we did not get as many photographs in the attached as hoped for. We will try to change that for the June issue. But, while the attached is heavy with text and with no links to speak of -- plans call for more links and less text in the future-- hopefully.I really do look forward to hearing from each and every one of you- and I am keeping score on who I hear from. I would especially like to hear about the format and content of the newsletter and about the AAFA operations and families.Never hesitate to ask a question or make a suggestion.Gil Alford, Interim Newsletter Editor
- Gil, I apologize for not replying sooner, but I do want to let you know that I have read all of your recent communications, though I never did locate theMessage 2 of 10 , Jun 11, 2013View SourceGil, I apologize for not replying sooner,
but I do want to let you know that I have read
all of your recent communications, though I never
did locate the attachment you mentioned.
I have been trying to think of suggestions for the online
newsletter and meetings, but I have always thought
that both are exceptional and any improvements
would only be tweaks to already excellent programs.
John and I both agree that alternating meeting locations
between states with early Alford settlements and those
with larger AAFA membership would be better than
choosing one state for all future meetings.
This is despite the fact that Texas and Houston
were suggested, and most of John's family
now lives in Houston.
I have always thought that tours to the lands
where the early Alfords resided would be
as interesting as the tours to local attractions.
They would be more interesting to me, but I do
realize that they are often not near the larger cities
where hotels suitable for meetings are located.
One exception to that was Nashville, but no tours
to Alford lands and cemeteries in the area
were planned even then.
Any way you can work out technologically for you
to participate in the meetings would be great.
We are definitely planning to make it to Raleigh
and very much appreciate the choice of a pet-friendly hotel.