Re: [dxlab] LotW Backlog continues to grow ...
- On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Peter Laws <plaws@...> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV <lists@...> wrote:I sit corrected. I have been shown evidence that there was a design!
> Your use of the word "redesigned" carries with it the implication that
> the system was "designed" in the first place. Without a shred of
> evidence other than 20 years experience in IT, I strongly believe that
> someone threw together a proof-of-concept system and the higher-ups
> insisted that it go into production.
I stand by the rest of my post.
Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train!
- On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 2:33 AM, Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@...> wrote:
It is certainly a sign of competence and design skills when you realize the LoTW system was deployed on SAN technology 10+ years ago. That was leading edge architecture at the time, and unlikely to be found outside of corporate server farms or large data centers.
For anyone interested in considerations the regarding the marriage of SANs and Database architecture, here's an article describing the issues facing system designers. It's a pretty decent primer on some basic database design too.
73 de Bob - KØRC in MN
Thanks for the link, Bob. Enterprise decisions concerning SSDs are the same as I went through when deciding to use them. 8*)Speaking of enterprise...do you know of any studies comparing MTBF for consumer vs enterprise SSDs?
Ken - K4XL
BoatAnchor Manual Archive
BAMA - http://bama.edebris.com