Re: [AQ_NFS] Treatment of Submitted and Reserved in Temple Dates
- Fantastic! That resolved it.
On 10/31/2011 6:07 PM, Gaylon Findlay wrote:
> The design of AQ is to change the word "Reserved" to "Submitted" when it
> is downloaded from nFS to AQ. It appears that when we fixed something
> else in build 33, we broke the way AQ handled this name change. We just
> fixed this, and put out a patch file.
> If you would like this fix immediately, download this file:
> Then extract the contents ("ancquest.exe" and "aq.1033lng") to your AQ
> program file, which is normally:
> C:/Program Files/Incline Software/Ancestral Quest 12.1
> This will replace your current copy of AQ with the patched version,
> which contains this fix.
> On 10/19/2011 6:38 PM, Mike St. Clair wrote:
> > I'm not sure when this changed, but I've recently noticed a difference
> > in treatment after syncing with nFS.
> > At present, when you are doing a nFS review on a person and find that an
> > ordinance has been reserved but not completed, if you pull that
> > information into AQ it shows as Reserved, but AQ does not treat that the
> > same as it does Submitted. When Submitted is entered in a temple date
> > field, it shows as a letter for that ordinance in lower case - e.g.
> > Baptism shows as b, Endowment as e, etc. when looking at the Family
> > Since the change (perhaps build 33) the Family View is blank where those
> > ordinances formerly were marked with the lower case letters any time the
> > field contains Reserved.
> > Formerly, those reserved ordinances were marked in the AQ file as
> > "Submitted", or perhaps AQ displayed the lower case letters when
> > Reserved was present.
> > All I know is to get an accurate display of work that is reserved but
> > not completed in the Family View, I have to globally replace Reserved
> > with Submitted. I didn't formerly have to go through that step, which
> > is somewhat of a pain when you are doing a project and get interrupted,
> > losing track of what portion of a family you have completed.
> > I might note that in the Sealed to Parents date field, if you use Review
> > to pull in the contents of that field to AQ, it puts "Submitted" in and
> > displays properly. I believe this matches the behavior that formerly
> > occurred in the Baptism and Endowment field. I'd sure like to see those
> > handled the same way once again.
> > Mike St. Clair
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]