Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [AQ_NFS] Re: Replace/Edit remote fact

Expand Messages
  • Gaylon Findlay
    Eric: Send them to my address, gfindlay@ancquest.com. Thanks, Gaylon
    Message 1 of 8 , Apr 3, 2009
    • 0 Attachment
      Eric:

      Send them to my address, gfindlay@....

      Thanks,

      Gaylon


      register wrote:
      > I have the screen shots but I should send them to you privately rather than
      > plug up this forum. I will send them to wherever you direct.
      >
      >
      >
      > Eric
      >
      >
      >
      > Eric & Marnie Abell
      >
      > Saanichton, BC, Canada
      >
      > (250) 652 4616
      >
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: AQ_NFS@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AQ_NFS@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
      > Gaylon Findlay
      > Sent: April 3, 2009 1:33 PM
      > To: AQ_NFS@yahoogroups.com
      > Subject: Re: [AQ_NFS] Re: Replace/Edit remote fact
      >
      >
      >
      > Eric:
      >
      > Again, please take some screen shots to document visually what you are
      > doing and send them directly to me. It will help us recreate a similar
      > situation as best as we can to answer this better.
      >
      > Gaylon
      >
      > Eric wrote:
      >
      >> Further to the situation below. How does it happen that when reviewing a
      >>
      > person my ordinance information is marked (unofficial) but I have a chance
      > to sync this ordinance data to nFS. I elect to do that but, again, no change
      > occurrs in nFS. I can understand why it would not change but I cannot
      > understand why AQ implies that it will change.
      >
      >> Eric
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >> --- In AQ_NFS@yahoogroups. <mailto:AQ_NFS%40yahoogroups.com> com, "Eric"
      >>
      > <emregister@...> wrote:
      >
      >>> It I elect to relace a remote event it may or it may not. If the event is
      >>>
      > a birth and I replace it with my data which is the standardized place name
      > it looks like it will work but in reviewing in nFS it has not been replaced.
      > Nothing happenss. It did, however, in the few I looked at, work to replace
      > the burial event.
      >
      >>> If I Add to the remote as an additional fact then nFS shows my new entry
      >>>
      > as an alternate addess.
      >
      >>> The additional information is fine but it should be clear that the data
      >>>
      > is not being replaced.
      >
      >>> Eric
      >>>
      >>>
      >>>
      >>
      >>
      >> ------------------------------------
      >>
      >> Yahoo! Groups Links
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      >
      >
      >
      > ------------------------------------
      >
      > Yahoo! Groups Links
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
    • register
      Now that I have synchronized everyone I want to check the parent and spouse sealings. I am not having a lot of luck. Is there a tutorial or more
      Message 2 of 8 , Apr 4, 2009
      • 0 Attachment
        Now that I have synchronized everyone I want to check the parent and spouse
        sealings. I am not having a lot of luck. Is there a tutorial or more
        comprehensive description than on the help system? Any ideas/tips will be
        appreciated.



        Eric



        [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.