901Re: Treatment of Submitted and Reserved in Temple Dates
- Oct 19, 2011A post script to my recent posting:
"In Process" when copied in a similar manner from nFS is properly
displayed in the Family View.
On 10/19/2011 6:38 PM, Mike St. Clair wrote:
> I'm not sure when this changed, but I've recently noticed a difference
> in treatment after syncing with nFS.
> At present, when you are doing a nFS review on a person and find that
> an ordinance has been reserved but not completed, if you pull that
> information into AQ it shows as Reserved, but AQ does not treat that
> the same as it does Submitted. When Submitted is entered in a temple
> date field, it shows as a letter for that ordinance in lower case -
> e.g. Baptism shows as b, Endowment as e, etc. when looking at the
> Family View.
> Since the change (perhaps build 33) the Family View is blank where
> those ordinances formerly were marked with the lower case letters any
> time the field contains Reserved.
> Formerly, those reserved ordinances were marked in the AQ file as
> "Submitted", or perhaps AQ displayed the lower case letters when
> Reserved was present.
> All I know is to get an accurate display of work that is reserved but
> not completed in the Family View, I have to globally replace Reserved
> with Submitted. I didn't formerly have to go through that step, which
> is somewhat of a pain when you are doing a project and get
> interrupted, losing track of what portion of a family you have completed.
> I might note that in the Sealed to Parents date field, if you use
> Review to pull in the contents of that field to AQ, it puts
> "Submitted" in and displays properly. I believe this matches the
> behavior that formerly occurred in the Baptism and Endowment field.
> I'd sure like to see those handled the same way once again.
> Mike St. Clair