Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

418Re: [AQ_NFS] What good is Collaboration in nFS?

Expand Messages
  • Leslie Vaughn
    Mar 27, 2010
      I have had similar experiences. I have also been able to contact people when I see that our information conflicts and we compare sources and come to a consensus and one of us takes out the wrong information.

      I think that most people who use nFS are interested in sharing and comparing and learning from each other.

      About the subject of who is entitled to do work for the deceased: a direct descendant or that 2nd cousin once removed. As long as we abide by the 95 year rule, I think we are good to go no matter our relationship.

      One of you out there can probably quote the article and the author which I cannot do, but there has been recent articles in the Ensign about going searching out all the descendants of an ancestor and doing the temple work. This would mean 4th or 5th cousins 3 times removed.


      From: Jim Light
      Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 9:51 PM
      To: AQ_NFS@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: RE: [AQ_NFS] What good is Collaboration in nFS?


      I have read the several replies to your message, and I just wanted to add
      that I have had excellent experiences with the "collaboration" capabilities
      of nFS. Because of it I have not only met some wonderful distant cousins
      on-line, I have had the pleasure of meeting some of them in person, and we
      have been sharing our research, and through that getting the temple work
      done for many, many of our ancestors. Two of these cousins and I cover
      three of the five children of an ancestor born in Brooklyn in 1740. Maybe
      my cousins and I are just cooperative people, but we openly share this
      information and also take the responsibility to get the work done for those
      who are in our direct lines back to this ancestor.

      I couldn't be more thrilled.



      From: AQ_NFS@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AQ_NFS@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
      Alan Whitcomb
      Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 11:19 AM
      To: AQ_NFS@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: [AQ_NFS] What good is Collaboration in nFS?

      I am seriously not thrilled with the "collaboration" in nFS. Has anyone had
      any good experiences with it? All my experiences are distant relatives
      poaching my direct line ancestors.

      I am sincere about my question if anyone has had good experiences with

      My issue is not one with AQ, but there seems to be no following established


      On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Gaylon Findlay <gfindlay@ancquest.
      <mailto:gfindlay%40ancquest.com> com>wrote:

      > It is good to understand the difference between AQ and the Collaboration
      > Support component. You only install the Collaboration Support component
      > one time -- we have not had a need to update it in many, many years. The
      > main AQ program is constantly undergoing revisions and updates. As a
      > result, you will want to update the main program on a regular basis
      > (typically every few months, as adjustments are made.)
      > So the very first time you install AQ on a computer, you install both AQ
      > and its collaboration piece (if you intend to use the Collaboration
      > feature), and from then on you only need to update with the Basic
      > installer to update the program.
      > Gaylon
      > sdcline1 wrote:
      > > When I upgrade to build 23 on Monday morning, why do I choose
      > AQ12-1Basic.exe if I use collaboration? Wouldn't I want to upgrade
      > collaboration as well?
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > ------------------------------------
      > >
      > > Yahoo! Groups Links
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • Show all 10 messages in this topic