1697Re: [AQ_NFS] Requesting a synchrony feature
- Jun 9, 2014Hopefully, this is the case. Family Tree's development is on-going and
while it isn't perfect, they are also working toward doing more than
linking Family Tree (FT) with Ancestry.com. I suspect they are also
working on additional flexibility with the third-party API that allows
AQ and FT to more fully merge capabilities.
Fortunately, for us, AQ is an extremely powerful tool that goes beyong
what we can do in Ancestry.com, even with its ability to search out
and make connections, upload scanned images and so on.
I really, really hope that the FamilySearch staff has not stopped what
they are doing in terms of flexibility and power between software like
AQ and FT.
I also vote for the capability to move images back and forth between
AQ and FT. However, I also suspect it will be some time before this
capability is made available. Uploading an image, such as into
Ancestry and FT, likely follows the same pattern of uploading images
into any type of online database (including the research wiki). The
bigger problem in FT is that while one image may be good, another
image of the same material may be better and as such, FT will need the
capability to replace the "good" image with the "better" image without
using excessive storage space.
For those of you who are unaware, updating data (dates, places, etc.)
in Family Tree _never_ replaces the previously displayed data. It
hides the previous data and displays the data we supply as its
That poses a space problem with in comes to complex images and it
would not surprise me that we see size limits on what can be uploaded
(Ancestry's limit is 15 MB, which is still sizeable, but not enoujgh
for some photographs -- I have family group photos (including several
50th wedding anniversay shots) that exceed 100 MB in size, simply to
keep sufficient detail to be useful.
AQ does not pose a problem with photos of this size, simply because
all images are stored separately from the actual data and the database
only contains links to the images themselves.
Nevertheless, I hearily second the questions that Terry posed and
hopefully, Gaylon has something he can share (which isn't always the
On 09 Jun 2014 06:56:13 -0700, Terry wrote:
> There has been much encouragement from the FH department to place images of documents either into the "Sources" field or the "Memories" section of Family Tree.
> In AQ are plans being made to upload and link "Images" to Family Tree data which we have attached to our AQ Source information?
> In AQ are plans being made to upload and link "Images" in Family Tree which we currently have in our Scrapbook or Multimedia section of the personal software?
> Terry Mason
> Clermont FL
- << Previous post in topic