1399Re: [AQ_NFS] Love it....was;Retrieving and reconciling batches
- Jul 23, 2013Hi Terry, yes you are right it worked.
Tried the reconcile option last night again but had to shut down the system because of lightning. So this morning did it again and after 4 hours we came home and AQ had added all the temple submission batches.
What a wonderful tool this is. When reviewing the names we can see all the people that have individual ordinances completed but it also shows their missing ordinances.
Mostly missing SP and SS sealings in my case.
My complements to Gaylon and his team. This is a great tool to find closely related people in your data who are still missing ordinances.
Thank you Gaylon and team for this very easy to use part of AQ
From: Terry Smith <tdsfamgen100@...>
Cc: "AQ_NFS@yahoogroups.com" <AQ_NFS@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 6:05:12 PM
Subject: Re: [AQ_NFS] Retrieving and reconciling batches
If you have never used this freature before, than you will need to try
the reconcile option. If your user name is attached to FORs than it
will populate your people in the batcj screen. If you have a lot of
FOR s that you have submitted as I did, it may take a while for it to
load them all. Once they have been loaded subsequent runs will not
take as long, but I had over 1000 names submitted and it took a while
to load them all.
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 14:35:56 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
>when in Ordinance reserve and tracking and going to Manage Batches there is nothing showing yet because I never used AQ to actually submit names.
>My questions and observations:
>Is it possible and how do I add a previous submitted FOR?
>Can I add an FOR for other people. ie; I submitted names from my data under my sisters name.
>When reconciling, the program does not show any progress. There is no indicator of what the program is doing. And after almost 30 minutes I attempted to close the Manage Submitted Batches window and AQ crashed.
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>