Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

touches per minute

Expand Messages
  • bchaikin@aol.com
    i calculate possession factor (touches per min) by: poss fact = shots + passes + turnovers + times fouled = FGA + AST/X + TO +FTA/Y where X and Y are
    Message 1 of 8 , Apr 24, 2002

      i calculate possession factor (touches per min) by:

      poss fact =
             shots + passes + turnovers + times fouled = FGA + AST/X + TO +FTA/Y

      where X and Y are calculated yearly and by team...
                   
    • HoopStudies
      ... +FTA/Y ... Are X and Y secret?
      Message 2 of 8 , Apr 24, 2002
        --- In APBR_analysis@y..., bchaikin@a... wrote:
        >
        > i calculate possession factor (touches per min) by:
        >
        > poss fact =
        > shots + passes + turnovers + times fouled = FGA + AST/X + TO
        +FTA/Y
        >
        > where X and Y are calculated yearly and by team...

        Are X and Y secret?
      • HoopStudies
        ... +FTA/Y ... Let me also ask whether the factor matches what you would see in a game. For instance, if we calculate a player s touches per minute to be 2
        Message 3 of 8 , Apr 24, 2002
          --- In APBR_analysis@y..., bchaikin@a... wrote:
          >
          > i calculate possession factor (touches per min) by:
          >
          > poss fact =
          > shots + passes + turnovers + times fouled = FGA + AST/X + TO
          +FTA/Y
          >
          > where X and Y are calculated yearly and by team...

          Let me also ask whether the factor matches what you would see in a
          game. For instance, if we calculate a player's touches per minute to
          be 2 per minute, would that mean that, if he played 35 minutes, he
          would touch the ball, on average, 70 distinct times in those 35
          minutes?

          I ask because the formula seems to not include rebounds. Obviously,
          guys touch the ball when they get rebounds. If X and Y are team and
          year specific, then it is possible to have a couple guys with very
          different rebounding totals with similar possession factors. For
          instance, Jon Barry and Ben Wallace aren't terribly different in the
          main factors you list. Wallace has lower totals in all but FTA. But
          he had 800 more rebounds than Barry. How do these guys stack up?

          What was the original goal of the stat? Is it better to say that it
          is an estimate of touches on the offensive end?

          DeanO
        • bchaikin@aol.com
          Let me also ask whether the factor matches what you would see in a game. For instance, if we calculate a player s touches per minute to be 2 per minute, would
          Message 4 of 8 , Apr 24, 2002
            Let me also ask whether the factor matches what you would see in a
            game.  For instance, if we calculate a player's touches per minute to
            be 2 per minute, would that mean that, if he played 35 minutes, he
            would touch the ball, on average, 70 distinct times in those 35
            minutes? 

            yes - but my original research/analysis took place over the span of 3 seasons in the late 80s / early 90s, watching just under 1000 NBA games on tape, charting team and individual player ball possessions. the formulas are extrapolated from this data and streamlined for each season and each team (based on avg team yearly possessions and then each team's calculated possessions)...

            I ask because the formula seems to not include rebounds.  Obviously,
            guys touch the ball when they get rebounds.  If X and Y are team and
            year specific, then it is possible to have a couple guys with very
            different rebounding totals with similar possession factors.  For
            instance, Jon Barry and Ben Wallace aren't terribly different in the
            main factors you list.  Wallace has lower totals in all but FTA.  But
            he had  800 more rebounds than Barry.  How do these guys stack up? 

            think about it...to calculate how often a player handled the ball on offense you either have to count all the times he first gained possession of the ball while on offense, or what he did with the ball (how he got rid of it) each time he had the ball...again, what can a player do with the ball once he has it in his hands? he can either shoot it, pass it, get fouled, or turn it over (FGA + AST/X + FTA/Y + TO). other things can occur (off foul, double fouls, jump ball, techs, etc) but these occur only occassionally such that they can be ignored - if they were all measured they could be included...

            or how can a player gain possession of the ball while on offense? he can either start the team possession (get a pass from a player from out of bounds after the opposition has scored), start the team possession by catching an inbounds pass on an out-of-bounds play, simply receive a pass from another player on the court, or get an offensive rebound. i do not use def rebs because rarely does a player score immediately after getting a def reb (players do occassionally get rebounds, dribble the length of the court, and score, but the total # of times is insignificant compared to the total possessions and this parameter is tough to measure. if we had these numbers they could be added)..

            as for barry and wallace, i just uploaded the 01-02 reg seas stats to the online database so you can compare them there. just limit the database to the 01-02 season, and sort by possession factor, and you'll see how two players can have the same possession factor but different stats that when added up and divided by minutes played equal similar touches-per-minute ratings (poss fact)...

            also you can have two players with absolutely identical stats from two different seasons and they could easily have two different possession factors - because part of the rating is based on league averages. a simple example is shot blocking - two players can have the same # of blocks and minutes played in two different seasons but have their shot block rating vary by as much as half a percent or more based on what the rest of the league did that specific season. example - this past season jermaine o'neal blocked 166 shots in 2707 minutes and had a shot blocking rating of 3.6% (he blocked 3.6 of every 100 shots taken by the pacers opposition). in 1978-79 rich kelley of the jazz blocked 166 shots in 2705 minutes but had a shot blocking rating of only 3.2%....

            What was the original goal of the stat?  Is it better to say that it
            is an estimate of touches on the offensive end?

            the goal was to determine exactly how often each player handled the ball on offense so the computer could model the game, i.e. knowing how often each player handled the ball on offense and what he did with it (how often he would shoot, pass, get fouled, TO) once he did get the ball makes for an easy model for the computer to simply play a game...

            are the formulas "secret"? not really. complicated? not at all - four parameters (statistical categories - FGA, TO, passes, times fouled) and two variables. but there are upwards of 30+ formulas per season (one for each team), every season, although each is quite similar. you can actually back calculate them using the possession factors listed in the historical stats database at the APBR website or at www.bballsports.com....

            the best way to explain this would be to download a copy of the sim software i developed (members.aol.com/bchakin)  - again its free - and when you run a full season for any team it charts ALL ball possessions such that they can be added up easily. this is the best way to see "possession factors" or "touches per minute ratings" in action. plus the online stats databases lists possession factors for every player since 1977-78 for the NBA and even earlier for players in the ABA...

            bob chaikin
            bchaikin@...

          • dlirag
            ... software ... you run a ... they can be ... or touches ... lists ... even ... I have a shareware copy of B-Ball. It s fun in its own way and the
            Message 5 of 8 , Apr 26, 2002
              --- In APBR_analysis@y..., bchaikin@a... wrote:
              > the best way to explain this would be to download a copy of the sim
              software
              > i developed (members.aol.com/bchakin) - again its free - and when
              you run a
              > full season for any team it charts ALL ball possessions such that
              they can be
              > added up easily. this is the best way to see "possession factors"
              or "touches
              > per minute ratings" in action. plus the online stats databases
              lists
              > possession factors for every player since 1977-78 for the NBA and
              even
              > earlier for players in the ABA...

              I have a shareware copy of B-Ball. It's fun in its own way and the
              possessions per minute idea seems like a useful yardstick.

              Btw, is there a formula for estimating the number of times someone
              got fouled in a season by using only their FT attempts as data?
            • bchaikin@aol.com
              the key factor is of course a player s FTA, because FTA are the results of fouls (technical fouls are but a very small sampling), but i also take into
              Message 6 of 8 , Apr 27, 2002


                the key factor is of course a player's FTA, because FTA are the results of fouls (technical fouls are but a very small sampling), but i also take into consideration the player's team's total FTA (tougher when someone plays for two or more teams in a season), plus the team's total possessions...

              • alleyoop2
                Seems to me it wouldn t be that hard to estimate if you know opponents personal fouls, which are in Doug Steele s stats every morning: Times Fouled = (My FTA
                Message 7 of 8 , Apr 29, 2002
                  Seems to me it wouldn't be that hard to estimate if you know
                  opponents' personal fouls, which are in Doug Steele's stats every
                  morning:

                  Times Fouled = (My FTA / Team FTA) / Opponent PF

                  Technical fouls are the only thing that would make it tricky, and
                  then only for a guy like Jason Williams who almost never gets to the
                  line but shoots all his team's technical foul shots (I did a study on
                  this for the book and was amazed: Williams got nearly 30% of his FTA
                  from T's)







                  --- In APBR_analysis@y..., bchaikin@a... wrote:
                  >
                  >
                  > the key factor is of course a player's FTA, because FTA are the
                  results of
                  > fouls (technical fouls are but a very small sampling), but i also
                  take into
                  > consideration the player's team's total FTA (tougher when someone
                  plays for
                  > two or more teams in a season), plus the team's total possessions...
                • Michael K. Tamada
                  Looks like a good formula to me. In addition to technical fouls, the other (more minor) complication is offensive fouls. I say more minor because these fouls
                  Message 8 of 8 , Apr 29, 2002
                    Looks like a good formula to me. In addition to technical fouls, the
                    other (more minor) complication is offensive fouls. I say more minor
                    because these fouls don't affect a player's possessions, nor his free
                    throws -- they represent "PFs drawn" but they are not part of "PFs drawn
                    by an offensive player".

                    Jeez, 30% of FTAs being due to technicals, that surely must lead the
                    league, maybe even be a record. I suppose some set-shooting specialists,
                    the Craig Hodges/Steve Kerr types, might conceivably be up there too, but
                    they may not get enough technical FTAs to match JW.


                    --MKT


                    On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, alleyoop2 wrote:

                    > Seems to me it wouldn't be that hard to estimate if you know
                    > opponents' personal fouls, which are in Doug Steele's stats every
                    > morning:
                    >
                    > Times Fouled = (My FTA / Team FTA) / Opponent PF
                    >
                    > Technical fouls are the only thing that would make it tricky, and
                    > then only for a guy like Jason Williams who almost never gets to the
                    > line but shoots all his team's technical foul shots (I did a study on
                    > this for the book and was amazed: Williams got nearly 30% of his FTA
                    > from T's)
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    > --- In APBR_analysis@y..., bchaikin@a... wrote:
                    > >
                    > >
                    > > the key factor is of course a player's FTA, because FTA are the
                    > results of
                    > > fouls (technical fouls are but a very small sampling), but i also
                    > take into
                    > > consideration the player's team's total FTA (tougher when someone
                    > plays for
                    > > two or more teams in a season), plus the team's total possessions...
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
                    > APBR_analysis-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
                    >
                    >
                  Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.