Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Hollinger's Usage Rate Equation

Expand Messages
  • John Hollinger
    I somehow left out the Multiply by 40 part. If you re doing a ranking it won t affect the order at all, but it makes the rating a measure of how many
    Message 1 of 3 , Dec 5, 2004
    • 0 Attachment
      I somehow left out the "Multiply by 40" part. If you're doing a
      ranking it won't affect the order at all, but it makes the rating a
      measure of how many posesssions a guy uses per 40 minutes.

      John



      --- In APBR_analysis@yahoogroups.com, sultanoswat@y... wrote:
      >
      > Anyone able to get this working?
      >
      > This is what I have for Paul Pierce:
      > FGA: 239
      > FTA: 249
      > AST: 3
      > TO: 45
      > MIN: 565
      >
      > (239+(149*0.44)+(73*0.33)+45)*93.47/(565*95.25) = 0.648969
      >
      > I've tried it for a few different players/years, and have yet to
      get
      > anything close to the values he has in the Prospectus/Forecast.
      >
      > In the first prospectus it doesn't have the league pace in the
      > denominator, but just about everyone ends up with a rate of 30-40
      > points higher.
      >
      > Can anyone help?
    • sultanoswat@yahoo.com
      Thanks John - that was it. ... a ... 40
      Message 2 of 3 , Dec 5, 2004
      • 0 Attachment
        Thanks John - that was it.

        --- In APBR_analysis@yahoogroups.com, "John Hollinger"
        <alleyoop2@y...> wrote:
        >
        > I somehow left out the "Multiply by 40" part. If you're doing a
        > ranking it won't affect the order at all, but it makes the rating
        a
        > measure of how many posesssions a guy uses per 40 minutes.
        >
        > John
        >
        >
        >
        > --- In APBR_analysis@yahoogroups.com, sultanoswat@y... wrote:
        > >
        > > Anyone able to get this working?
        > >
        > > This is what I have for Paul Pierce:
        > > FGA: 239
        > > FTA: 249
        > > AST: 3
        > > TO: 45
        > > MIN: 565
        > >
        > > (239+(149*0.44)+(73*0.33)+45)*93.47/(565*95.25) = 0.648969
        > >
        > > I've tried it for a few different players/years, and have yet to
        > get
        > > anything close to the values he has in the Prospectus/Forecast.
        > >
        > > In the first prospectus it doesn't have the league pace in the
        > > denominator, but just about everyone ends up with a rate of 30-
        40
        > > points higher.
        > >
        > > Can anyone help?
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.