RE: [APBR_analysis] Re: the Ruben Patterson effect
>From: "monepeterson" <mone@...>Are you freakin' kidding me? What a HUGE steal if this happened for Dallas.
>Subject: [APBR_analysis] Re: the Ruben Patterson effect
>Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 21:08:11 -0000
>And so he has, allegedly Jason Terry, Alan Henderson and a first for Walker
>and Tony Delk.
>Terry and Henderson come off the books after this year, so barring
>re-signed players, it's
>Delk for a first. I don't get it. Why does Atlanta make this deal?
Terry AND a first? Wow. This would completely prove beyond a shadow of a
doubt that Atlanta is the worst franchise in the NBA.
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar � get it now!
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 smckibbi@... wrote:
> Great idea. Perhaps the criteria for deciding which swingman is guarding who
> would be the team's overall def points per 100 possessions when the swingman
> is on the court. The one with the lower pts/100 poss is guarding the better
> offensive player.
No, this is wrong. It's wrong because it favours bench players. Guys like
Bowen and Artest (and especially Bowen, because he's older) usually don't
guard the opposing bench's best player; they take a rest when the other
side's coach brings his bench players onto the floor.
You get a guy like Peterson on the Raptors, he's usually on the floor when
the other side's bench is, and usually not when their starters are. Now,
he's a good defender, but his stats are going to get enhanced under this
Here's a Modest Proposal: Track the overall offensive production per
minute or possession of the opposing team's players that a particular
player defends. Compare that to their offensive production per minute or
possession while he's on the floor. A negative result means a good
defender, a positive result means a bad one, zero means average.
GnuPG public key available from
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----