Re: Finals Stats after 3 games
- --- In APBR_analysis@yahoogroups.com, "Kevin Pelton"
> I can see your argument here. You're looking at more of a skill-
> based kind of rating, it would seem, while the Mikes are more
> concerned with looking back and divvying up credit for what
> on the court amongst individuals. Both are valid ways of lookingat
> things. Would it make sense to list two ratings?I would definately consider listing different ratings. Eventually, I
plan on printing individual player pages with expanded stats and
that seems like a good place to list different versions of FG%.
> (I think the same thing, for the record, about your created fieldI've actually been fiddling around with the formula for created FG%
> goal percentage ... while the metric with all shooting attempts is
> interesting and revealing, I think only counting some proportion
> of "created" attempts would be more valuable.)
with that idea in mind. I'll let y'all know when I come up with
something worth mentioning.
> On the issue of technical fouls ... I think there should be somethis
> credit given to players who are superb free-throw shooters, as
> is a skill that's helping their team. In the first _Pro BasketballI agree... Good FT% has a positive effect on team/individual offense
> Prospectus_, JohnH suggests crediting them for making greater than
> league average (75%) at the line.
in many ways and there should be a way a reflecting that.