Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [APBR_analysis] Re: Value of the triple double

Expand Messages
  • igor eduardo küpfer
    ... From: Dean Oliver To: Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 1:30 PM Subject: [APBR_analysis] Re: Value of
    Message 1 of 8 , Dec 9, 2003
    • 0 Attachment
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "Dean Oliver" <deano@...>
      To: <APBR_analysis@yahoogroups.com>
      Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 1:30 PM
      Subject: [APBR_analysis] Re: Value of the triple double


      > This seems like a good way of looking at it. Not significant at what
      > level?

      Chi-squared = 0.264, df = 1, two-tailed p value = 0.6075

      I should add that I didn't double count the triple doubles, ie group 1 was
      individual 3Ds and group 2 was combined team 3Ds minus individual 3Ds.

      ed

      --- In APBR_analysis@yahoogroups.com, igor eduardo küpfer
      <igorkupfer@r...> wrote:
      >> <snip discussion of triple double correlation with wins>
      >>
      >> In the 2002-03 season, I count 42 triple doubles (3D), with the 3D
      >player's
      >> team winning 29 of those games -- 69%. In the same season, I count
      >233 teams
      >> having a combined 3D -- that is, at least one player having double-
      >digit
      >> points, rebounds, and assists (or double-digit points, rebounds,
      >and blocks,
      >> or double-digit points, assists, and blocks) although not
      >necessarily the
      >> same player. Those teams won 64% of those games. A chi-squared test
      >shows
      >> that the difference is not statistically significant. This would
      >seem to
      >> indicate that an individual player triple-double has little, if any,
      >> predictive value.
      >>
      >> ed
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.