Re: Dick Cramer's baseball work -- Evaluating history vs ...
> That then changes the question to whether that improvement is 99%And of course there's the whole thing about baseball leaving out a
> training and other BobC reasons or whether it is only 10% those
> things and 90% genetic stuff. Not sure how you'd scientifically
> answer that question, but I think (going out on a limb) that most
> people would assume that it is training, better facilities, better
> doctors, etc.
significant portion of the population for no real good reason. I was
at a party where someone cynically suggested all the records being
broken today should have an asterix next to them for whatever reason
(short ballparks, juiced ball... can't recall). A response came that
everyone before 1947 should have an asterix as well.
*Against Caucasians Only.