Re: [APBR_analysis] Toine Walker & W-L
- --- Gary Collard <collardg@...> wrote:
> nik wrote:I certainly agree with this, and with most comments
> > This might be a stupid question but I'll ask
> > it anyway:
> > If Walker is the only star in the Celtics roster,
> > yet he "contributes" so many losses and there are
> > only 2 other players of NBA quality and all the
> > other players are scrubs or almost...
> > Then how did the Celtics win all these games
> > and got into the playoffs?
> Playing in the East helps. I have to think that if
> they had been moved to
> the West, they finish 12th of 15 and finish 10 games
DeanO made about Walker, but that wasn't exactly
what I was asking. Besides, Walker and others playing
against weaker competition in the East, is partly
included in their stats. My question had more to do
with the W-L contributing system that DeanO
uses and less with what kind of player Walker is
and whether he deserves all the dissing he gets.
I'm sure he has explained it in some of his previous
posts but I didn't study it carefully at the time
and I'm not sure whether there is a "royal way"
to understand it.
That's why I said that my question might be stupid,
in case I didn't get the idea behind his W-L
To be more clear... every player in a team
"contributes" some wins and losses. What is
the relation between the players' records and the
team's actual record? If you add all those
players' records, do you get the team's record?
Should you? (is this the meaning of the formula?)
Or is there a difference, which you may call
"coaching and other factors"? Or is it irrelevant?
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
- I was forced to watch a huge number of Hawks games this year. One
thing nobody talked about was how bad this team's bench was. Nazr
Mohammed just flat out sucked, and Alan Henderson wasn't much better.
Darvin Ham can't make a shot if it isn't a dunk, and Dan Dickau was a
total flop. The only halfway decent bench player was Ira Newble, and
he started half the season.
As for the Terry point/not a point issue, the real problem was that
he was the only guy who could handle the ball, especially when Newble
was starting at off guard, and that was why they made so many TOs.
The Hawks just need somebody else who can dribble and take the
pressure off; which guard spot he plays is almost irrelevant.
As for Big Dog, he should be a bench dog. The team played better
without him, and at this point Newble is better anyway.
--- In APBR_analysis@yahoogroups.com, "lilnemoinslumber"
> --- In APBR_analysis@yahoogroups.com, "aaronkoo" <deano@r...> wrote:them?
> > 4. There are some good pieces in Atlanta. What to do to fix
> Take the ball out of Terry, Robinson, and Rahim's hands.
> Atlanta's "Big Three" are averaging a Big 3 TO's apiece.
> The Big Question is who exactly will be at the helm? Do they keep
> Stotts? Do they go after a Big guard to play point and keep Terry
> the 2? Do they undergo a Big overhaul in their offensive schemes tois
> try and eliminate the TO inducing iso's? Or do they punt?
> One at a time:
> We can't divine who will end up as coach, but we'll assume Stotts
> staying on. He brought the Hawks a bit of cohesion as their secondbe
> half finish can attest.
> I like the idea of a big guard playing point to Terry's 2. But it
> seems most tall ball-handling guards either look to score for
> themselves or are too easily harassed by quicker, smaller guards.
> Admittedly, getting Glenn to play D, or Theo to stay healthy would
> the answer. But playing better team D, and cutting down onturnovers
> really ought to be enough to get this crew into the playoffs. Inthe
> east at least.