Re: Yao Ming
- I think that the smits comparison with ming is probably close (but
post was a great low post scorer). the interesting thing about smits
was that he was taken in front a great college guard in Mitch
Richmond much the same way Ming was taken over J Williams. not sure
smits was actually more valuable than richmond (I know pacers already
had miller so it was not a bad choice), i guess time will tell with
ming and j williams.
--- In APBR_analysis@y..., john wallace craven <john1974@u...> wrote:
> John Craven
> I AM STILL THE RULOR OF THE WORLD!!!11!11!!!
> I PITY THE POOR FOOL WHO ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO!!!1!!!!111!!!
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, alleyoop2 wrote:
> > I'll go ahead and be the bastard who disagrees with everything
> > has been said.
> > First, at this point in his career I don't think Bradley's
> > value is particulary high. Statistically, he blocks a lot of
> > but that ingores the big picture:
> > *****that's all he can do******
> Yeah, I agree. That's basically the problem with guys that big, I
> With very few exceptions (Muresan, Mark Eaton), they just aren't
> enough to do more. You've got to realize that while guys like
> Yao Ming might be in the top 10% of guys their height athletically
> speaking, every 6'6" player in the NBA is in the top 1%, at least.
> > He can't stop people from getting position in the post, he can't
> > in front of anybody, and he can't even foul somebody hard enough
> > stop them from dunking on him. His effort also slipped noticeably
> > from last season, which is how he gave up 33 points and 26
> > to a mediocre player like Lorenzen Wright and ended up on the
> > the rest of the season. Blocks are a small part of defensive
> > effectiveness, and while they often indicate a great defensive
> > player, sometimes they lie.
> With the new rules, Bradley's just about useless. His only value was
> standing in the lane and intimidating small players, and now that
> stand in the lane that's gone.
> > Second, am I the only person who think Yao Ming can score 20
> > game, maybe get 7 or 8 rebounds and throw in three blocked shots?
> > just projecting from limited information the same way you guys
> > but it sure seems to me has more in common with Ralph Sampson or
> > Smits than he does with Shawn Bradley.
> I think you're underrating where Bradley was - or at least where
> thought he was - coming into the league. There was a ton of talk of
> having worked out with Kareem Abdul-Jabbar and having developed a
> as a result. His outside game was always suspect, but *many* pundits
> thought he would be an effective post player because of the hook and
> because of talents he'd shown before he went on his mission.
> Yes, there were mitigating circumstances there - apparently,
> not play basketball at all in the two years after he turned 19 -
> are mitigating circumstances in Ming's case, too: namely that he
> shown the ability to dominate vastly inferior opposition. For all
> of his being bulkier than the average guy his size, he looks VERY
> to me. Could he average 20 and 7.5? I guess so, if you gave him the
> minutes, but if Ming is even able to play the 40+ minutes per game
> would take (I would not be surprised in the least if he's foul-
> other teams would be able to exploit him at will.
> Anyway, while it's entirely possible that Ming will become a Rik
> see him as more of a Brad Lohaus or Pete Chilcutt - centers who
> from long range, but didn't have enough other skills to play more
> minutes a night.
> John Craven
- --- In APBR_analysis@y..., "airiverson01" <airiverson01@y...> wrote:
> what was his cba ft% and 3ptfg%?i
> also he did play in the olympics. i taped the usa v. china game.
> think he had two blocks a few points maybe and fouled out early inI've got boxes for at least 6 of his Olympic games. They're not the
> the second half. i think he will be maybe an all star someday, but
> probably not mvp or hof.
greatest format. I could post them if other people want to reformat
and repost in more useable format. Against the US, he had 5 pts, 2
blocks, and 5 fouls in 15 minutes. Wang Zhi-Zhi played a lot better
than Ming. The US shot 57% against the Chinese and won by 47. They
got 70 points in the paint. They got 22 points off second shots and
completely dominated the offensive boards. Part of Ming's problem
was that the guards could not get him the ball. On the defensive
side, I'm not sure what you can blame his problems on.