3679Re: Dampier (was Article from _The Economist_)
- Apr 6, 2004
> I looked at peak Manley Credit performances for 54 All-NBA players.Valuable stuff, Ed.
> I plotted the aging curve here:
> The decline after age 30 is precipitous. Only 14 of 48 (29%) 31
> year-olds maintained their 30-year-old performances.
The projection system I've worked on has the theoretical benefit of
being able to capture effects like centers peaking later or good
players peaking later in that only the performance of similar players
is used for projection. It was actually reasonably optimistic about
Dampier -- by contrast to his backup, Adonal Foyle, who is the same
age, Dampier had a lower rate of coppaging (defined as 20% decline or
greater, 22% vs. 28%) and a higher rate of improvement, but still one
below 50% (46% vs. 36%). Dampier, by this system, is playing at about
the 80% level of expectation -- not entirely unsustainable, but not
an easily predictable level either.
(How much this would change if I improved the system to add Dampier's
production prior to 2002-03 I don't know.)
One of the nice things about this system, which I've blatantly stolen
from _Baseball Prospectus_' Pecota, is that it looks at player
performance as probabilities as opposed to absolutes. The average
player development is important and valuable, but at the same time
we're really looking at, in Ed's case, 54 different player
development curves being slammed together. The average curve may
model the actual performance of only a handful of players.
I think it's better to say something like "Dampier is 75% likely to
play worse next season" as opposed to "He will play worse next
season" -- something I got away from a little bit during my previous
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>