Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

3286Re: My version of WINVAL (my analysis of it)

Expand Messages
  • wimpds
    Feb 26, 2004
      Right, my mistake.

      --- In APBR_analysis@yahoogroups.com, "doc319" <doc319@y...> wrote:
      > I've got the article right in front of me and in the sidebar chart
      > Pip is 4th and Rip is 5th.
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > --- In APBR_analysis@yahoogroups.com, "wimpds" <wimpds@y...> wrote:
      > > >
      > > > 4. I believe WINVAL had Scottie Pippen as the 2nd best player
      > last
      > > > year. That is closer to your WV2. It's amazing to me how much
      > > > weighting by clutch time matters in your system, which makes me
      > > > reconsider whether it is a good measure. Perhaps it exaggerates
      > a
      > > > bit. Regardless, it implies that perhaps the method -- KF vs
      > > > regression -- isn't as important as how you treat crunch time.
      > > (You
      > > > can say the same thing about human perception, of course. We
      > seem
      > > to
      > > > give a lot of credit to players who hit clutch shots, perhaps
      > more
      > > > than we should.)
      > >
      > > WINVAL's top5:
      > >
      > > 1. Garnett
      > > 2. Duncan
      > > 3. Nowitzki
      > > 4. Rip Hamilton
      > > 5. Pippen
      > >
      > > (source: April 27, 2003 NY Times)
    • Show all 30 messages in this topic