2297Re: Effect of rest
- Jun 30, 2003--- In APBR_analysis@yahoogroups.com, Gary Collard <collardg@e...>
> Dean Oliver wrote:better
> > What was weird about the study on rest is that 1 day off was
> > than 2 days off and no days off. It seemed to be the optimal restI also realize that I have to refine the study a bit to make sure
> > period.
> This seems like it could be the effect of routine,
> play-travel/practice-play with an additional day of rest?/practice?
> throwing that off. Maybe it is more mental than physical, although
> sharpness could start to become an issue as the number of days off
it's not picking up too much of the road/home effect. There are a
few other potential biases it could pick up without a lot of care.
In doing this, I should be able to get at the win% by time on the
road. (I think the results are going to be generally fine, but I
knew there were reasons I'd never published this stuff.)
Relating this back to that other topic -- did they play more back-to-
backs in the old days? If so, we may be able to adjust for that...
- << Previous post in topic