165Re: [APBR_analysis] Nets trades: Why (again)?
- Jun 30, 2001I'm confused about your concerns with these deals. New
Jersey has made themselves 100 percent improved. Kidd
over Marbury, if that's the deal, is a no-brainer.
Kidd is a better player, all-around, and is not a
cancer in the locker room. He will make the Nets much
better. The three lower first-round picks may seem
like a steal by the end of the year. Give it a chance.
Eddie Griffin, I'm told is soft and doesn't like to
work. He's been compared to Coleman, loads of talent,
but little desire. Jim Hekel, Rowley, Iowa.
--- harlanzo@... wrote:
> At the risk of losing any semblance of an sanity or__________________________________________________
> analysis, I must say that I have no idea what the
> Nets are doing.
> Trading Marbury for Kidd makes little sense. It
> just looks like they
> want a team the will be quasi-competitive with no
> players with high
> upside like the young Griffin and Marbury for Kidd
> (28) and a bunch
> of low first round picks.
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>