Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Professor Peter Ucko - UK Independent Obit 21 June 2007

Expand Messages
  • Mata Kimasitayo
    http://news.independent.co.uk/people/obituaries/article2686806.ece Professor Peter Ucko Maverick archaeologist who oversaw a revolution in the structure and
    Message 1 of 1 , Jun 20, 2007
    View Source
    • 0 Attachment
      http://news.independent.co.uk/people/obituaries/article2686806.ece

      Professor Peter Ucko

      Maverick archaeologist who oversaw a revolution in the structure and outlook
      of his profession

      21 June 2007

      Peter John Ucko, archaeologist: born London 27 July 1938; Lecturer in
      Anthropology, University College London 1962-72, Director, Institute of
      Archaeology and Professor of Comparative Archaeology 1996-2006 (Emeritus);
      Principal, Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies 1972-81; Professor of
      Archaeology, Southampton University 1981-96; died London 14 June 2007.

      Peter Ucko was the most influential archaeologist of his time. Almost
      single-handed, he brought about a revolution which irrevocably changed the
      whole structure and outlook of international archaeology.

      This upheaval began in 1986, when - in scenes of frantic drama and
      controversy - the profession's international body exploded at its congress
      at Southampton University. Out of the smoke and debris there emerged the
      World Archaeological Congress, dedicated to new and radical principles which
      included the notion that archaeology was profoundly political and that the
      archaeology of indigenous peoples in post-colonial continents - societies
      for whom the relics of a distant past were still components of a living
      culture - was more significant than the academic and Eurocentric studies of
      "prehistory".

      With his tight curls and his powerful, mobile face, Peter Ucko resembled a
      small Roman emperor. Passionate and unpredictable in his loves and hates, he
      could put superhuman energy behind causes and people he believed in (he was
      still editing a book on Chinese archaeological training on his death-bed).
      His own formation was as much in anthropology as in archaeology, one of the
      sources of his gift for breaking through academic barriers. Anthropology
      also satisfied his need (as he put it) "to be taught by and to meet
      academics who had respect for the beliefs and activities . . . of the people
      of other cultures". His antipathy to racism was always violent. As a friend
      wrote about him, "the reason Peter is such a good hater is the motivation
      which powers the hate - a deeply felt anger at unfairness and injustice".

      Peter John Ucko was born in 1938, the son of intellectual Jewish emigrants
      from Germany. From his father, a doctor, he inherited a lasting delight in
      music, especially opera. After the "progressive" public school of Bryanston,
      he began an anthropology degree at University College London in 1956, but
      always - so he later said - hoped to get into Egyptology, a lifelong craze
      which began when he collected figurines off antique stalls as a boy. After a
      PhD on Egyptian figurines, he spent 10 more years at UCL lecturing with
      increasing brilliance and originality in anthropology.

      In 1967 Ucko and his then partner Andrée Rosenfeld published his first book,
      Palaeolithic Cave Art. Shortly afterwards, they moved to Australia where in
      1972 he became principal of the Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
      This was to be a decisive, radicalising experience. "I found that my
      Institute was a totally white institution - whites gave out money to whites,
      through white committees, to study the blacks . . . an untenable situation."
      When he left in 1980, he made sure, against angry opposition, that his
      successor was an Aboriginal. It was in Australia that he met the
      anthropologist Jane Hubert, then married to Anthony Forge (who died in
      1991), who was to become Ucko's stout-hearted partner and counsellor for the
      rest of his life.

      Back in Britain, in 1981 he became Professor of Archaeology at Southampton
      University. And it was here, in the 1980s, that he encountered the crisis of
      his professional life. The International Union of Pre- and Protohistoric
      Sciences (IUPPS) proposed to hold its 11th congress at Southampton and Ucko
      was persuaded to organise it. At that time (it has improved since), the
      IUPPS had decayed into a slovenly, deeply conservative and Eurocentric
      clique. To its horror, Ucko insisted that he wanted the conference to be a
      "World Archaeological Congress", attended by archaeologists from "the Third
      World" and devoted to global themes rather than to the cosy comparison of
      excavations and discoveries.

      After enormous exertions, he seemed to be getting his way when disaster
      struck. Unwisely, Ucko had pushed to the back of his mind the crisis of
      apartheid South Africa, and the existence of an international academic
      boycott. But in 1986, only months before the congress, the Southampton
      student union and then the municipal authorities declared that they would
      withdraw all facilities if South African archaeologists attended. Worse,
      many of the African and Asian delegates now threatened not to take part.

      Well aware of the storm he would provoke, Ucko decided that the cause of a
      new "world archaeology" must not be abandoned. He declared that the South
      Africans would be disinvited. It was an act of outstanding courage. Uproar
      followed. Ucko was accused of betraying academic freedom. Funders withdrew;
      many of the leading archaeologists of Europe, Britain and America resigned
      from the congress and denounced him - sometimes with shameful abuse which
      they would now prefer to forget. The IUPP condemned him and pulled out.

      But Ucko, urged by Jane to stand fast whenever his resolve faltered, stuck
      to his guns. In the end, over a thousand enthusiastic delegates arrived and
      Ucko's dream of a new global order for a humanised science of the past was
      triumphantly realised. The first World Archaeological Congress (WAC-1) took
      off, and no fewer than 22 books were published from its sessions.

      The cost was heavy, not least to Ucko's health. He had lived off his nerves
      for 20 years, a heavy smoker with a generous wine intake; now appeared the
      first signs of the diabetes which was to end his life prematurely. And the
      crisis did not improve his confidence in his fellow humans. Students got the
      benefit of his tough humour and his adventurous, eccentric imagination. But
      colleagues had to tread warily; you were in or out. He could be childishly
      sullen and suspicious one day; brilliantly welcoming and lovable the next.

      In 1996, he was appointed director of the Institute of Archaeology at UCL,
      Britain's leading centre of teaching and research. There were grumbles from
      crusty colleagues. But the maverick Ucko was now, beyond challenge, the most
      creative figure in British archaeology. In 1997, he launched the first
      courses in Public Archaeology, typically redefining it as a critical audit
      of the profession's ethics in areas as diverse as the handling of the
      indigenous dead and archaeology in the media.

      He retired in 2006. Surprisingly, Ucko refused to accept the presidency of
      the WAC, but his master-work lives on, its vast congresses sparkling with
      fresh insights and theories. The 1980s were a decade in which British
      innovation in archaeology (for better or worse) led the world. Margaret
      Thatcher "privatised" the profession, while Ian Hodder, Chris Tilley and
      Michael Shanks invented "postprocessual" theory. But Ucko's contribution
      will outlast them all: an irreversible, institutionalised commitment to an
      archaeology which happens now rather than in the past, and is concerned with
      the living as much as with the dead.

      Neal Ascherson

      © 2007 Independent News and Media Limited

      - -

      Mata Kimasitayo
      Kimasita~aT~Bloomington~In~Us

      _________________________

      To extinguish hubris is
      more needful than to
      extinguish a fire !

      -- Heracleitos of Ephesos

      __________________________
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.