- Would someone be so kind as to forward me the Email that contains the links to
the OI publication PDFs (origin of the current thread)? I seem to have deleted
2113 St Paul St., 3rd floor
Baltimore, MD 21218
- The message is question is at:
ANE-2 archives in general are at
--- In ANEemail@example.com, "Michael F. Lane" <mflane@...> wrote:
> Would someone be so kind as to forward me the Email that contains the links to
> the OI publication PDFs (origin of the current thread)? I seem to have deleted
> it accidentally.
> Cheers! MFL
> 2113 St Paul St., 3rd floor
> Baltimore, MD 21218
> Tel. +1-443-610-4924
> Email mflane@...
- NYPL branches are no different from the main library, transportation-wise, and they don't have any sort of scholarly materials.
The accessible databases don't seem to include materials above the undergraduate level, and most of them are general-interest rather than research-worthy.
You call it complaining, I call it warning.
Peter T. Daniels grammatim@...
----- Original Message ----
From: "cejo@..." <cejo@...>
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 9:58:14 AM
Subject: Re: [ANE-2] JSTORation
>Note that access to JSTOR is out of the reach of independent scholars who do not have access to a scholarly library (I amWell, it looks as though JSTOR is accessible in all 81 Branch Libraries as well as the 5 central libraries of the NYPL, so you may in
>alumnus of two universities, and I am not located near either one; the New York Public Library, an hour and a half away, has an
>immensely cumbersome and expensive printout system for getting a copy of an article).
fact not have to go all the way down there.
In addition, they seem to be providing access to you from your home, simply by having you type your NYPL card number into a
form, to a wide variety of databases (though evidently not JSTOR - but EBSCOHOST parallels a lot of the same material for recent
volumes), some of which include journals which are of historical interest to you.
http://www.nypl. org/databases/ index.cfm? act=2&j=home
http://tm9qt7lg9g. search.serialsso lutions.com/
Also, you aren't REQUIRED to use online resources if you don't want to. You also aren't REQUIRED to complain about them.
- Peter Daniels writes:
> You call it complaining, I call it warning.He has a genuine point. As a practical matter, I don't think it affects
the issue of access to JSTOR, which has been abundantly addressed and is
not really a problem. There are genuine problems of access by independent
scholars to scholarly materials and of maintaining the quality of libraries.
JSTOR definitely makes life easier for this independent scholar. Whatever
problems are caused by its limitations would be much worse if JSTOR were
not available. Recognition of that fact does not make the problems caused
by the omission of many journals from JSTOR go away; it only signifies
that we have to keep trying to increase access to scholar materials. The
only real problem I have with having libraries subscribe to electronic
databases of articles and books is what happens when they decide to let
their subscriptions lapse. Formerly, when a library cancelled its subscription
to a journal, it could retain the journals it had already received, but
when a library cancels its subscriptions to an electronic database, it
has nothing to show for having had the subscription.
The review journal Mathematical Reviews had, I think, a policy that
encouraged libraries to get both the printed version and the power
Math-Sci database derived from it. That at least left the libraries
with the journals when they decided to cancel subscription to the
database. The mathsci database costs a couple of thousand for an
annual subscription when I last checked a few years ago. It's an easy
item not to be able to afford when a library's budget shrinks. It
is available freely from the online terminals at the Science, Industry
and Business library in NYPL, by appointment, appointments being rather brief,
but unlike the databases such as JSTOR, it can't be accessed online by people
with NYPL cards, not even if they have access cards to the research libraries.
So, there are genuine problems and Peter Daniels is right to insist on
the fact that they exist. However, JSTOR is not in itself a problem.
It is part of the solution.
Allan Adler <ara@...>
* Disclaimer: I am a guest and *not* a member of the MIT CSAIL. My actions and
* comments do not reflect in any way on MIT. Also, I am nowhere near Boston.