Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Re: no first century

Expand Messages
  • Dierk van den Berg
    Ich bewerte die unten angehängte Postille zunächst einmal nur als klassischen Aprilscherz ohne jeden Nährwert. Es sei denn, S. Goranson kann mir erklären,
    Message 1 of 2 , Apr 1, 2007
      Ich bewerte die unten angehängte Postille zunächst einmal nur als
      klassischen Aprilscherz ohne jeden Nährwert. Es sei denn, S. Goranson
      kann mir erklären, welche Intention dahinter verborgen sein soll.

      Dierk van den Berg
      RU Nijmegen, NL
      -------------------------------------------
      kullu nafsin dsa 'iqatu l-mawt (surah 3.185)
      *all living is pervaded by the taste of death*
      [Momentum of Shiite al-Mahdi Messianism]









      --- In ANE-2@yahoogroups.com, goranson@... wrote:
      >
      > Q. Salm, having declared that Nazareth did not exist in the first
      century AD or
      > CE (not a sherd), has teamed up with E. Doudna, who announced that
      there is not
      > a single first century Qumran Dead Sea Scroll (not a fragment), to
      assert,
      > incredibly, that there was in fact no first century at all!
      Consulting top
      > professors of symbology (contracts prevent naming) failed to
      convince them that
      > the first century ever existed! Their shocking neoscience work
      points to
      > misdirection by the shifty monk Dionysius the Egregious and a
      society of
      > time....
      >
      > who's that
      >
      >
      >
      > S. Goranson
      > April 1
      >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.