Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

no first century

Expand Messages
  • goranson@duke.edu
    Q. Salm, having declared that Nazareth did not exist in the first century AD or CE (not a sherd), has teamed up with E. Doudna, who announced that there is not
    Message 1 of 2 , Apr 1, 2007
      Q. Salm, having declared that Nazareth did not exist in the first century AD or
      CE (not a sherd), has teamed up with E. Doudna, who announced that there is not
      a single first century Qumran Dead Sea Scroll (not a fragment), to assert,
      incredibly, that there was in fact no first century at all! Consulting top
      professors of symbology (contracts prevent naming) failed to convince them that
      the first century ever existed! Their shocking neoscience work points to
      misdirection by the shifty monk Dionysius the Egregious and a society of
      time....

      who's that



      S. Goranson
      April 1
    • Dierk van den Berg
      Ich bewerte die unten angehängte Postille zunächst einmal nur als klassischen Aprilscherz ohne jeden Nährwert. Es sei denn, S. Goranson kann mir erklären,
      Message 2 of 2 , Apr 1, 2007
        Ich bewerte die unten angehängte Postille zunächst einmal nur als
        klassischen Aprilscherz ohne jeden Nährwert. Es sei denn, S. Goranson
        kann mir erklären, welche Intention dahinter verborgen sein soll.

        Dierk van den Berg
        RU Nijmegen, NL
        -------------------------------------------
        kullu nafsin dsa 'iqatu l-mawt (surah 3.185)
        *all living is pervaded by the taste of death*
        [Momentum of Shiite al-Mahdi Messianism]









        --- In ANE-2@yahoogroups.com, goranson@... wrote:
        >
        > Q. Salm, having declared that Nazareth did not exist in the first
        century AD or
        > CE (not a sherd), has teamed up with E. Doudna, who announced that
        there is not
        > a single first century Qumran Dead Sea Scroll (not a fragment), to
        assert,
        > incredibly, that there was in fact no first century at all!
        Consulting top
        > professors of symbology (contracts prevent naming) failed to
        convince them that
        > the first century ever existed! Their shocking neoscience work
        points to
        > misdirection by the shifty monk Dionysius the Egregious and a
        society of
        > time....
        >
        > who's that
        >
        >
        >
        > S. Goranson
        > April 1
        >
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.