Re: [ANE-2] Re: [Megillot] Qumran again: NYTimes misreporting, etc.
- At 15:37 16/08/2006, goranson@... wrote:
>if Qumran were such a strategic site, why was it uninhabited for, well,Changing Dead Sea levels? The Ein Feshkha springs are very near the
>most of human history?
400 meters below sea level mark. And during the high level periods of
the Dead Sea, ~300 mbsl, even Qumran was under water (IIRC the
plateau is at about 325 mbsl).
[100% bona fide dilettante ... delecto ergo sum!]
Ariel L. Szczupak
AMIS-JLM (Ricercar Ltd.)
POB 4707, Jerusalem, Israel 91401
Phone: +972-2-5619660 Fax: +972-2-5634203