Re: [ANE-2] Re: Wadi el-Hol editio princeps?
- (1) You overlooked my scare quotes; and
(2) When something has a name, that name sticks, even if it becomes outdated by later discoveries. We still use "Indo-European" (chosen on the basis of the known geographic extent of the phylum) even though we now have "Tocharian" from well beyond India. (Scare quotes because that Greek ethnonym isn't, in fact, what the speakers of the two languages called themselves -- like "Hittite" used for Nesite.)--
Peter T. Daniels grammatim@...
----- Original Message ----
> From: Brian Colless <briancolless@...>(1) I am puzzled when people refer to "Proto-Sinaitic" inscriptions
> To: ANEemail@example.com
> Sent: Tue, June 22, 2010 8:17:15 AM
> Subject: [ANE-2] Re: Wadi el-Hol editio princeps?
being found in Egypt; the Sinai peninsula is the only place that
Sinaitic inscriptions are found (whether proto- or whatever).
Gordon Hamilton and I are poles apart on some matters, but he rightly
uses Proto-Canaanite for the whole corpus of early West
Semitic riting, no matter where any of it is discovered.