9876Re: [ANE-2] Margaret Murray
- Feb 11, 2009Hi guys (non sex specific)
I'm sure we can all agree that Petrie, unlike many of his
contemporaries, was prepared to encourage and support the careers of
female scholars? He could hardly do anything else with the example of
his wife's commitment to his (their) work. The list of women who
benefited from his tutelage is a long and honourable one, not diminished
by his description 'we are overrun with lady students wanting to come
out [to Egypt].... It will be a great help of we develop a corps of lady
artists to turn on to important places.' Not to mention the
In editing the recent 'Unseen Images: Archive Photographs in the Petrie
Museum' we made a point of acknowledging the contribution of Hilda
Petrie and Winifred Brunton, although the original text always referred
to Petrie singular and Brunton singular.
I'm sorry if I'm making heavy weather of this and I promise not to say
Very best wishes to all
Jan (female!) Picton
>On 10 Feb 2009 at 21:00, Max Dashu wrote:--
>> I thank Jan Picton for his rebuttal of the challenge to Margaret
>> Murray's bona fides as an Egyptologist, and would like to further
>> comment on this remark:
>I have never denied Margaret Murray's bona fides as an Egyptologist - nor
>challenged such. Like Jan you seem to want to construct a 'straw man'
>what I have written - carefully please. They are very limited statements -
>not a blanket denial
>of Margaret Murray being an expert Egyptologist.
Secretary, Friends of the Petrie Museum (Tel: 07761 823129)
H.R.A. Institute of Archaeology, UCL. j.picton@...
Sessional lecturer, Egypt and the Ancient Near East
Home email: janpicton@.... Fax: 0870 164 1855
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>