9147RE: SV: [ANE-2] Qeiyafa inscription 'ALT`S
- Nov 2 4:27 AMNothing wrong with reverting back to old Alt if he has something new to say,
or even old thats right.
I wouldnt venture an opinion on what he says in this particular case
because I dont have his article in front of me, but is it is as you state
it, it requires a small bit of modification. Look at Exodus 23:1 and 7 where
al is used in negative commands which are certainly categorical. But in
these cases the al is a secondary prohibition subsumed under a primary
prohibition mentioned right before them which uses lo.
From: ANEfirstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:ANEemail@example.com] On Behalf Of
Niels Peter Lemche
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2008 2:17 PM
Subject: SV: SV: [ANE-2] Qeiyafa inscription 'ALT`S
Hm, are we not back to the old division in biblical Hebrew between lo' &
imperfect and 'al & jussiv? More to it than that? Modern Hebrew usage is
probably of no consequence here.
Back to old Alt (need a smiley here): lo' & imperfect a categorical demand,
"thou shall not etc", 'al & jussiv less categorical: "Please, do not ..." I
know that I am back in the Jurasic Park of biblical scholarship.
Niels Peter Lemche
Fra: ANE-2@yahoogroups. <mailto:ANE-2%40yahoogroups.com> com
[mailto:ANE-2@yahoogroups. <mailto:ANE-2%40yahoogroups.com> com] På vegne af
Sendt: den 2 november 2008 13:10
Til: ANE-2@yahoogroups. <mailto:ANE-2%40yahoogroups.com> com
Emne: RE: SV: [ANE-2] Qeiyafa inscription 'ALT`S
I must take issue with Ariel's comment here about the Israeli school system
and the average Israeli's knowledge of Hebrew. Many years ago I tacked a
sign on an office computer reading "Lo tiga` bammahshev!" (Thou shalt not
touch the computer!), rather than the expected "al tiga bammahshev", and
wouldn't you know it if our department secretary didn't try to correct it.
Obviously she is ignorant of the Ten Commandments. Fact of the matter is
that prohibitive commands are not expressed with lo but with al. Ariel, do
you tell your children "lo tesaheq barehov", or "al tesaheq barehov"?
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>