2987Re: [ANE-2] weavers
- Dec 5 5:44 AMThe statement that David loved Jonathan does NOT necessarily imply a homosexual relationship as you have implied on numerous occasions.
----- Original Message ----
From: Andrew Fincke <finckean@...>
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2006 7:48:13 AM
Subject: Re: [ANE-2] weavers
Good point, George. Horner already saw this in David Loved Jonathan, 1977, though I don't have the specific page reference on hand. The curse on Joab's house is misplaced - the target is rather Saul, who fell by the sword, that is his own. The holder of the spindle is Jonathan - he "held" the spindle, David's, in their erotic act. Tod Linafelt gave a nice paper at SBL showing how the whole lament in 2 Sameul 1 is meant sarcastically - specifically verse 22 praising Saul's sword and Jonathan's bow as signs of their "heroism". Maybe somebody can help me with the part about the leprosy at 3:29, The "lacking bread" has a parallel in the curse at 1 Samuel 1:36.
George F Somsel <gfsomsel@yahoo. com> wrote:
Thanks for that. I don't know how I missed it when I looked it up. It seems there are only two instances of this word. Other apparent instances are actually of a homonym deriving from a different source. It would seem that your judgment that handling a spindle was considered a curse for a man is based on 2 Sam 3.29
29May [the guilt] fall upon the head of Joab and all his father���s house. May the house of Joab never be without someone suffering from a discharge or an eruption, or a male who handles the spindle, or one slain by the sword, or one lacking bread.�� ���
Jewish Publication Society. (1997, c1985). Tanakh: The Holy Scriptures : A new translation of the Holy Scriptures according to the traditional Hebrew text. Title facing t.p.: Torah, Nevi'im, Kethuvim = Torah, Nevi'im, Ketuvim. (2 Sa 3:29). Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society.
That is a passage I had nearly forgotten. It probably does have that implication.
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>