1703Re: Origins of Cultivation (was Re: [ANE-2] Old Figs)
- Jun 3, 2006RE: Robert Whiting's comment:
Perhaps there was a confusion between the terms domestication and cultivation. To cultivate implies "production of food by preparing the land to grow crops". This might mean planting a seed after scratching the ground with a stick and dropping seeds into the loosened soil.
The article about figs indicated that the figs were evidence of human cultivation without providing details or proof of how the author determined the figs were planted by hand or gathered from fig trees growing wild. Whether the figs were thought to be hybrids from natural cross pollination or pollination by hand. The fig was usually pollinated by a wasp. When the fig was unpollinated it may have been scratched/dressed to enhance a ripening without pollination. This was a form of agricultural technology but not cultivation.
James Mellaart studied the Neolithic of upper Syria and Anatolia. He cited a study where wild emmer not cultivated was gathered by hand in great quantities. Such seed may have been stored in unfired clay silos from early dates without any cultivation having occurred. Domestication of numerous plants and animals was thought to have occurred as early as the Neolithic.
Years ago I read a study that put man's ability to start fires from sparks or friction to about 100,000 BP. A few years later I saw another study had moved that date back to 250,000 BP or earlier. It does not have much to do with cultivating figs or plowing ground.
David Q. Hall
Robert Whiting <whiting@...> wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, DAVID HALL wrote:
> Having read that man made fire may have been sparked by 250,000 BP and
> another study indicating men kindled fires about 100,000 BP,
> one might presume we do not know when the first cultivation occurred.
I fail to see what the connection is between the ability to make fire and
the origin of cultivation. One might as well speculate on the connection
between the making of stone tools and the origin of cultivation.
> Wild wheat was gathered before people learned to produce the hybrid
> grain that clings to the head after it is ripe. They may have been
> scattering seeds on the ground as cultivation long before they learned
> to select the best seeds to produce the hybrid (tame) grain that may
> have been produced in the Neolithic if not earlier.
While we may not know precisely when the first cultivation occured, we
know more about it than this idle speculation might imply. For a recent
summary of specialist knowledge on the origins of cultivation, see <i>The
Origins of Agriculture and Crop Domestication</i>, Proceedings of the
Harlan Symposium, 10-14 May 1997, Aleppo, Syria, Edited by, A.B. Damania,
J. Valkoun, G. Willcox, and C.O. Qualset, available as an e-publication at
One of the leaders in research on the origins of cultivation is the CNRS
Institut de Préhistoire Orientale, Jalès, France, where experimentation
with wild progenitors of cereals has taken place over a long period.
See in particular WILLCOX, G. " Agrarian change and the beginnings of
cultivation in the Near East: evidence from wild progenitors, experimental
cultivation and archaeobotanical data." In: J. Hather (ed): <i>Change in
subsistance systems: social theory and biological processes</i>. World
Archaeological Conference, Routlege: London, 1999. 478-500.
George Willcox and his colleagues from Jalès have also written a ton of
other articles on the topic which can be found with a Google search.
Near Columbia university University of helsinki
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "ANE-2" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>