Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

15032RE: [ANE-2] Licit Antiquities Trade

Expand Messages
  • Trudy Kawami
    Jul 16, 2013
      Actually a museum or collector selling an art work may well be in the same boat as someone selling a looted pot. There are still ongoing issues with museum ownership of Renaissance to 20th century works that found their way into the art market after being seized or coerced from their owners by the Nazis. It is not a simple problem and there are no easy solutions.

      Trudy S. Kawami

      From: ANE-2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:ANE-2@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of David Hall
      Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 6:12 AM
      To: ANE-2@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: Re: [ANE-2] Licit Antiquities Trade

      There is a need to prevent looting and trafficking in stolen property. An artist or museum selling a painting is not the same as a thief doing an illegal dig and selling the loot to an antiquities dealer. Antiquities dealers may legally obtain artifacts and sell them.

      It is presumed some antiquities thieves dug without the permission of the landowner(s). This is a problem as the individual(s) did not respect the property rights of others. There is also a need to preserve archaeological sites as professional archaeologists may provide more scientific data than a grave robber finding an artifact without providing data about the stratigraphic context or locality where the artifact was found. Archaeological sites have been protected in order to preserve artifacts in the interest of those needing to research historical and cultural identity. In Israel someone may need to get a permit before digging for artifacts and to provide detailed reports of their work in order for scholars to be able to have a chance to study reports of the finds.

      David Q. Hall
      Port Charlotte, FL


      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • Show all 11 messages in this topic