10511Ebla palace G
- Apr 16 1:35 PMIt is very difficult to determine how & why a town, village, palace or
house burned. We keep forgetting how dangerous buildings full of grain
and textiles could be when all cooking was done with open fires.
Remember the Great Fire of London or even Chicago. Neither of these were
invasions; both leveled a good part of each town; and because of their
manner of rebuilding neither have preserved the textiles & wood that we
find at Neolithic Catal Huyuk which also burned frequently. These are
Hasanlu, Iran, is a clear example of looting & burning, that is
aggression. You can see how chaotic it was as looters carrying their
booty were caught & killed in the collapsing buildings.
Palace G at Ebla did not hold any victims caught in the collapse and it
is hard to find any specific damage of an attack. But that does not mean
that it's destruction was an accident. Sometimes we just don't know -
yet. As for the lapis lazuli & other goods found in the ruins, remember
that the palace was 2 or 3 stories high. Even if you knew that there was
lapis lazuli under there it would be hard to know exactly where to dig.
One would need food & shelter, and given the disruption of such an
incident, whether by intention or accident, digging for lapis lazuli
would not be uppermost in the mind. As for an army cleaning out the
place before torching it, well that doesn't always happen. Look at the
ivory storerooms at Nimrud. There is no easy answer to your question,
As proof, he cites the enormous amount of raw lapis lazuli and other
precious goods that were left behind in the apparently unsalvagable
remains (though one is left to wonder how modern archaeologists could
salvage them if the poor ancients were somehow left unable to do so) as
proof that an invading army was not the culprit, for they undoubtedly
would have seized the booty before setting the torches upon the palace.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- << Previous post in topic