Dear Joe: I share with you your sentiments. I do believe that the reason for not moving to ISCAT can be answered by your third question. Has it been hard toMessage 1 of 8 , Apr 5, 2011View SourceDear Joe:I share with you your sentiments. I do believe that the reason for not moving to ISCAT can be answered by your third question. Has it been hard to get people to change, because they like a familiar way of doing things?People mostly tend to stick to what they are familiar with.So please just wait and you will see more activity with ISCAT.With all my respects to you.Best 73Omar YK1AO----- Original Message -----From: Joe TaylorSent: Monday, April 04, 2011 6:24 PMSubject: [wsjtgroup] ISCAT and JT6M
This is a request for some specific feedback from WSJT users.
As I understand things the JT6M mode is still widely used in EU, despite
having been replaced (in WSJT 9.0) by ISCAT -- a mode with significantly
1. Is my understanding correct?
If so, I hope some users will offer their explanations of why this might
be so. For example:
2. Are some users skeptical of my statement that ISCAT has
"significantly better performance"?
3. Has it been hard to get people to change, because they like a
familiar way of doing things?
4. Something else?
I ask these questions, in part, because ISCAT should be a superb mode
for making inter-continental QSOs on 6 and 4 meters under marginal
propagation conditions likely to be more common in coming months.
One good example: recently SV8CS worked ZS6WAB on 70 MHz using ISCAT,
Another example of an unexpected and very fruitful use of ISCAT: VK7MO
and VK3KH have been making 500+ km QSOs at 10 GHz, using aircraft scatter.
ISCAT is a powerful mode. In a number of ways its capabilities are
complementary to FSK441, JT65 and JT4. Under all relevant propagation
circumstances I've been able to document, ISCAT performs better than JT6M.
Soooo..., once again, can someone please clarify the ISCAT-vs-JT6M
situation in Europe for me?
Am I misinformed? Is a transition to ISCAT simply taking longer than I
might have expected? Or are there other considerations that I should
know about, but don't?
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
I am presently working on various improvements to the ISCAT mode in WSJT 9.0. I m looking for recordings of ISCAT signals that might help me in making furtherMessage 1 of 8 , Apr 14, 2011View SourceI am presently working on various improvements to the ISCAT mode in WSJT
I'm looking for recordings of ISCAT signals that might help me in making
further enhancements to the decoder. The best files for this purpose
are those with weak signals close to the decoding threshold...
especially ones that you think should have decoded, but did not; or
perhaps they partially decoded. If you have some examples of such *.wav
files, please send them to be as email attachments. Be sure to include
an indication of band and propagation mode.
-- 73, Joe, K1JT