Browse Groups

• ## New septenarius for a'=440 Hz, was Re: Werckmeister's Septinarius temperament

(26)
• NextPrevious
• ... agreed, hence i do return to W s original 131. ... also right, hence so the resulting ratios get even more simple: The calculations benefit from that by
Message 1 of 26 , Apr 17, 2007
View Source
--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Tom Dent" <stringph@...> wrote:
>
> > 1113/1112 c#"556 c#'278 c#139
> > 417/416 g#208 G#104
> > eb'312 eb156 Eb78
> > bb'468 bb234 Bb117
> > f'351
> > 1053/1052 c"526 c'263/262 131
> > g'393/392 196 98 49=7*7
>
> I don't think this is so good, you have C-G tempered by 262/263
> which
>
> Better to have 315/350 f'350 f175 and 525/524 c''524 c262 131 ... ?
>
also right, hence so the resulting ratios get even more simple:
The calculations benefit from that by less computational0 overhead.

start traditional @ pitch-class GAMMA=G alike in:

http://www.celestialmonochord.org/log/images/celestial_monochord.jpg

GG 49 := 7*7 (GAMMA-ut, the empty string in the picture)
D 147
3D441 > a'440 a220 A110 AA55Hz=the AA-string of a double-bass
e 165
3e495 > b'494 b247
3b741 > f#"740 f#'370 f#185
c# "555
3c#"1665 > g#"'1664 g#"832 g#'416 g#208 G#104 GG#52 GGG#26 GGGG#13
EEb 39
Bb 117
3Bb351 > f'350 f175
3f525 > c"524 c'263 c131
3c393 > g'392 g196 G98 GG49=7^2 returned

!septenarius_GG49Hz.scl
sparschuh's version @ middle-c'=262Hz or a'=440Hz
12
!absolute pitches relativ to c=131 Hz
555/524 ! c# 138.75 Hz
147/131 ! d
156/131 ! eb
165/131 ! e
175/131 ! f
185/131 ! f#
196/131 ! g
208/131 ! g#
220/131 ! a 440Hz/2
234/131 ! bb
247/131 ! b
2/1

That results on my old piano in the first/lowest octave:

AAA 27.5 Hz lowest pitch, on the first white key on the left side
BBBb29.25 next upper black key
BBB 30.875 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_bass "at~30.87 hertz"..
CC_ 32.875
CC# 34.6875 := c"555/16
DD_ 36.75
EEb 39 := GGGG#13Hz*3
EE_ 41.25 ..."E1 (on standard four-string basses) at ~41.20 Hz
FF_ 43.75
FF# 46.25
GG_ 49 := 7*7 Werckmeister's/Scheibler's initial septimal choice
GG# 52 = GGGG#13Hz*4
AA_ 55 = 440Hz/8 ; 3 octaves below Scheibler's choice

http://mmd.foxtail.com/Tech/jorgensen.html
#133: "Johann Heinrich Scheibler's metronome method of 1836"

http://www.41hz.com
"41 Hz is the frequency of the low E string on a double bass or an
electric bass." if it has none additional 5th string
for midi(B0)=BBB 30.875 Hz an 2nd above AAA 27.5 Hz,
the lowest A on the piano, without attending or even careing
"string-imharmonicty"
http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=JASMAN0000760000S1000S22000004&idtype=cvips&gifs=yes

Consider the 3rds qualities in violins empty sting G-D-A-E block order:

1: G > B > Eb> G
2: D > F#> Bb> D
3: A > C#> F > A
4: E > G#> C > E

1: G > B > Eb > G.
absolute analysis:
GG 49.
5*49 = 245 < b'247 < 248 124 62 31
5*31 = 155 < eb156 Eb78 EEb39
5*39 = 195 < g196 G98 GG7*7.
relative diesis 128/125 subpartition:
G 123.5/122.5 B 96/95 Eb 196/195 G
G ~14.1 cents B ~18.1 Eb ~ 8.86c G

2: D > F# > Bb > D.
abs:
d147. < 148 74 37
5*37 = f#185 < 186 93
5*31*3=3*155 < 156*3 78*3 39*3 = Bb117
5*39*3=3*195 < 196*3 98*3 49*3 = d147.
rel:
D 148/147 F# (1/9+85)/(84+1/9) Bb 196/195 D
D ~ 11.4c F# ~ 20.5 cents Bb ~ 8.86cents D

3: A > C# > F > A.
abs:
AA55. A110 < 111 = 37*3
5*111= c#"555 = 5*111 < 112*5 56*5 28*5 14*5 7*5
5*35 = f175 < 176 88 44 22 11
5*11 = AA55.
rel:
A 111/110 C# 112/111 F 176/175 A ; with all 3 factors superparticular
A ~ 15.7c C# ~ 15.5c F ~ 9.86c A

4: E > G#> C > E.
abs:
e165. < 166 83
5*83 = 415 < g#'416 g#208 G#104 GG#52 GGG#26 GGGG#13 §§
5*13 = 65 130 < c131 < 132 66 33
5*33 = e165.
rel:
E (6/7+118)/(117+6/7) G# 131/130 C 132/131 E
E ~ 14.6 cents ~ G# ~ 13.3 cents C ~ 13.2c E
§§ GGGG# 13 Hz has negative "midi"-index G#_-1,
which midi-keyboard supports negative key indices?

Summary:
3rds martix in "Cents"
5ths in top>down order
3rds in left>right direction respectively:

1: G 14.1 B_ 18.1 Eb 8.86 G
2: D 11.4 F# 20.5 Bb 8.86 D
3: A 15.7 C# 15.5 F_ 9.86 A
4: E 14.6 G# 13.3 C_ 13.2 E

Conversely "ET" detunes all 3rds about the same amount:
(128/125)^(1/3) = ~13.7Cents or ~127/126,
Attend that: the "septenarius" fits therefore better than ET to
horns and trumpets in Eb,Bb & F, with inherent natural
3rds Eb>G, Bb>D, & F>A that turn out less than 10Cents out of tune
in the septenarius case.

> (cf. 12ET frequencies: 261.6, 277.2, 293.7, 311.1, 329.6, 349.2,
> 370.0, 392.0, 415.3, 440.0, 466.2, 493.9 ...)

In the "ET" case, it is difficult to resolve the
septenarian root-factors above alike:
11,13,31,37 & 83 below the well known 3,5 & 7 limits.
>
> Can one use the nice ratio 63/50 = 1.26 to build a 'septenarian' >near-
> equal tuning?
on the one hand is:
(63/50)(4/5)=126/125
but but on the other side
the diesis 128/125=(128/127)(127/126)(126/125)
contains 3 factors.
hence:
(63/50)^3 = 2.000376... > 2/1
overstretched octave
or as superparticular ratio:
((63/50)^3)/2= 250047/250000=(7/47+5320)/(5319+7/47)
~1/2 per mille
but a better approximation of the octave delivers 127/126
the factor in the middle:
((5 / 4) * (127 / 126))^3 = ~1.99999802............

> eg Eb-G = 150:189 ...
> via Eb150 Bb225 (675) F337 (1011) C505 (504) G378=189
>
> then continue:
> ... (567) D283 (849) A424=212 (636) E635 (634) B951 (2853/2848)
> F#356=178 C#267 (801) G#400 Eb300
>
> seems to work nicely at late Baroque pitch levels - only three pure
> fifths between Eb-Bb, G#-Eb, F#-C#.
>
that is expanded:
A 424 212
3A636 > E635 > 634 317
B951 > 950 475
3*475=1425 > F#1424 712 356 178 89
C# 267
801 > G# 800 400 200 100 50 25 Werckmeister's tief-Cammerthon 400Hz
Eb 75
Bb 225
675 > F 674 337
1011 > C 1050 505 > 504 252 126 63
G 189
567 > D 566 283
849 > A 848 424

recombining that 5ths-circle in ascending ordered pitches yields:
C 252.5 Hz middle_C
C#267
D 283
Eb300
E 317.5 or better 317?
F 337
F#356
G 378
G#400 Beekman's, Descartes's, Mersenne's & Sauveur's standard-pitch
A 424
Bb450
B 475.5 or better 475?
C'505

T.D. remarked already in his numbers inbetween:

>B951 (2853/2848)
> F#356

that there appears an unsatisfactory irregular gap:
of 2853/2848 = 570.6/569.6 = (951/950)(1425/1424)
induced by the choice of
E 635 > 634 317 instead
635 > E 634 317
That results in the above none-integral superparticular ratio bug.

Hence i do suggest to replace
by the tiny changes
1: E 635-->>>634
2: B 951-->>>950
in order to fix the bug.

so that now all 5th-tempering steps become integral superparticular
ratios, without any exception:

A 424 212 106
3A=318 E 317 instead formerly 317.5
3E=951 B 950 475 instead formerly 951 475.5
3B=1425 F# 1424 712 356 178 89
&ct.
the rest of the circle remains unchanged.
Is that ok?

Analysis of the:
3rds sharpness, -how much wider than 5/4-
per diesis subpartition into superparticular factors,
so that the product of 3 tempered 5ths results an octave
in each of the 4 blocks:

1: G > B > Eb > G.
abs:
G378. 189 > 190 95
5*95 = B 475 < 480 240 120 60 30 15
5*15 = Eb75
5*75 = 3*125 < 126*3 = G378.
rel. 2^7/5^3=128/125=
G 190/189 B 160/159 Eb 126/125 G remember (63/50)(4/5)=126/125
?or formerly in the original version:
?G378. 189 > 190 95
?5*95 = 475 950 < B951 < 960 480 240 120 60 30 15
?......
?rel. 2^7/5^3=128/125=
?G (190/189)(951/950) B 320/317=(2/3+106)/(105+2/3) Eb 126/125 G
That appears i.m.o. much more complicated than my suggested change.

2: D > F# > Bb > D.
abs:
D283. < 284 142 71
5* 71 = 355 < F#356 178 89 < 90 45
5* 45 = Bb225 < 226 113
5*113 = 565 < D556 283.
rel. 128/125=
D (284/283)(356/355) F# 90/89 Bb (226/225)(556/565) D

3: A > C# > F > A.
abs:
A424. 212 106 53
5* 53 = 265 < C#267 < 268 134 67
5* 67 = 335 < F 337 < 338 169
5*169 = 845 < A 848 424.
rel: 128/125=
A 133.5/123.5 C# (268/267)(168.5/166.5) F >>>
>>> F (338/337)((2/3+282)/(281+2/3)) A

4: E > G# > C > E.
E 317. < 320 160 80 40 20
5* 20 = G#100 < 101
5*101 = C 505 < 506 253
5*253 = 1265 < E 1268 634 317.
rel: 128/125=
E (2/3+106)/(105+2/3) G# 101/100 C (506/505)/(422.666.../421.666...) E
?or formerly
?E 635? > 640 320 .....
?....&ct. alike above...
?....
?5*253 =1265 < 1270 635?

try to find out similar improvements in order to reduce the ratios
to less complicated proportions

have a lot of fun in whatever tuning you do prefer
A.S.
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.
• Changes have not been saved
Press OK to abandon changes or Cancel to continue editing
• Your browser is not supported
Kindly note that Groups does not support 7.0 or earlier versions of Internet Explorer. We recommend upgrading to the latest Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, or Firefox. If you are using IE 9 or later, make sure you turn off Compatibility View.