So you are now offering your same useless insight in this
group. How exciting.
For your info, many public offices and more and more
private companies are not accepting cash. The reason has nothing to do
with your assertions, and everything to do with their desire to avoid being
robbed. By your own definitions, federal reserve notes are the same as
checks and credit card purchases, since the latter two are based on the
former. So, to point out that a particular govt office doesn't accept cash
while neglecting that the same office will accept checks, cannot possibly mean
what you are trying to imply.
I think pretty much everyone here understands that federal
reserve notes are based on no hard assets but only on the so-called faith and
credit of the fed govt. I think everyone here already understands that
America is no longer on the gold standard, and that Constitutional money is
based on gold or silver. And I think everyone here already understands
that the Federal Reserve is no more federal than Federal Express.
So please don't subject us to dozens of posts each and
every week making these same claims as if you are the only one in the world who
understands these issues, like you did in the last group where I met
And the judge ruled against you because she believed you
were insane. No one but you believes that cash is the only form of
money. The rest of America believes that checks, money orders and credit
card charges are money also. As a result, the rest of us would have
responded to you the same as the judge did for your assertions that the DA's
office "did not want money" and would not accept money simply because it did not
want a pile of cash sitting around just asking to be stolen.
Yours in freedom,
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 11:53
Subject: [tips_and_tricks] Re:
Tax statutes here concern "dollars" not
Prosecutor demanded $4300 and in bold,
underlined capitals he
"THIS OFFICE DOES NOT ACCEPT
Interoggatories were served on theDirector of Revenue
be answered under oath. Prosecutor wrote
"irrelevant" to all
questions and wrote that they
were answered under oath WITHOUT A
There is no evidence that Director of Revenue saw them
they were mailed to her, certified with return
Trial was without jury, to my surprize since I had
other trials with juries.
Prosecutor introduced as evidence, tax
by the state AND copies of letters the state sent me
years ago stating the returns are not valid without
I had the judge take judicial notice that "cash"
money after she examined the letter from prosecutor.
I then said
"he does not want money." She ruled
against me as she had to no
matter what took place
in court. Justice cannot be permitted in tax
that level. There is no doubt that I would have won
there had been a jury. Trial lasted 40 minutes.
Nobody wants us
to pay taxes, they want us to pretend
or be punished. The object is
to regulate our use of
money that Keynes called "worthless" so that it
not become useless as he warned.
I offer 100 pounds of
money to each person who just
describes the money that government
you can use some extra money?