In the sentences below we find reference to mala en se laws not requiring consent of the governed from this link:Message 1 of 3 , May 20View Source
In the sentences below we find reference to mala en se laws not requiring “consent of the governed” from this link: http://www.thefederalistpapers.org/current-events/what-is-the-law-of-natures-god
“This idea that Jefferson was referring to two separate systems of laws is supported by a statement made by John Quincy Adams in a court case in 1841. He claimed that:
“In the Declaration of Independence the Laws of Nature are announced and appealed to as identical with the laws of nature’s G-d, and as the foundation of all obligatory human laws.”
Call me at: 720-675-7230
On Skype: legalbear
Best times to call: 8:30 am to 9:00 pm MST
Join my Yahoo Group Tips & Tricks for Court by sending an email to:
My blog: legalbearsblog.com
Tax sites: IRSTerminator.com IRSLienThumper.com IRSLevyThumper.com
(formatted like this so this email doesn't end up in your spam folder)
I would interpret that as Nature has a G-d or G-d is natures creator.Message 1 of 3 , May 20View SourceI would interpret that as Nature has a G-d or G-d is natures creator.
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, Artie Ada <artie2011z@...> wrote:
> He said Nature's G-d right? Nature is the owner of G-d.
> --- On Mon, 5/20/13, Legalbear <bear@...> wrote:
> > From: Legalbear <bear@...>