I have a theory for discussion that Federal laws are drafted in
conformance with the constitution and 10th Amendment, and that it is
their misapplication that should be pointed out.
Public Law 86-70
June 25, 1959
To amend certain laws of the United States in light of the admission of
the State of Alaska into the Union, and for other purposes.
[H. R. 7120]
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled, That this Act may be cited as
the âAlaska Omnibus Actâ.
TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF CERTAIN FEDERAL LAWS
SEC. 3. Any Territorial law, as that term is defined in section 8(d) of
the Act of July 7, 1958 (72 Stat. 339, 344), providing for the admission
of the State of Alaska into the Union-
(a) which provides for the regulation of commerce within Alaska by an
agency of the United States, and
(b) the application of which to the State of Alaska is continued solely
by reason of such section 8(d), shall cease to apply to the State of
Alaska on June 30, 1961, or on the effective date of any law enacted by
the Legislature of the State of Alaska which modifies or changes such
Territorial law, whichever occurs first.
The Alaska Omnibus Act changed the applicability of Federal law to
Alaska after Alaska changed from a Federal territory/state to a State of
I think this issue is what the Attorney General of Virginia is fighting
in his lawsuit against Obamacare. I really wish someone in Arizona
would point out the above to the Feds.