Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, 333 wrote:
> this exclusivist perspective therefore leaves only the following options
> available to the up-and-coming Magus prior to 2000 (2160?) years' passing:
> a) she can submit to the Magus Crowley and identify hirself
> with Crowley's Word
> b) she can accept Crowley's status and dispute his expression
> on the duration of aeons (leaving room for hir new Word
> to take precedence (or come up with fantastic loophopes,
> such as Nema's Word-intrusion into the present from the
> c) she can reject Crowley's expression about singular Words
> while accepting his status, uttering a new Word and
> having them resonate, mingle, combat, etc.
> d) she can reject Crowley's status temporarily, in which case
> his Word was 'in error' and she may correct it
> e) she may reject Crowley's status entirely, uttering hir
> Word and paying little attention to Crowley at all.
There's also f) the individual may reject the exclusivity of the idea at
all, and view the picture as that of a greater sentence or paragraph or
story, rather than just one "Word".
Love is the Law, Love under Will.
the Reverend Rob ICQ: 1280871
http://www.realm-of-shade.com .`. .`. .`. .`. http://www.reverendrob.com
"I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that there is nothing unclean
of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him it is
unclean." - Romans 14:14