--- In thelema93-l@y..., deliverator@t... wrote:
> > Oh, that reminds me. When are we going to see all the Internal
> > Rituals, Constitution, the wonderful Culling Charter to the
CoASS, as well
> > as the By-Laws online?
> I rememberlist a fervent request on another list to fellow UR-OTO
> that the Motta rituals be kept private as well. I always found
> standard to be quite telling (and interesting.) I don't expect to
> disclosure from them any time soon
Full disclosure is this, the Crowley rites were already publicly
available in libraries across the world. The Motta rites are not. The
privacy of the Motta rites is the request of myself and other who use
the rite as they are easily bypassed if the secret is known on how to
pass them. As such, twits would be a part of the order. I, nor did
the whole UR-O.T.O., never approved of the posting of the AC rituals.
A small contingent approved.
The disclosure on why the Motta rite is not being published etc is
because I am the one who has the material available in english and to
allow them to be published brings me into a civil suit that I neither
want nor can I afford. The SOTO does not have Oaths, but contracts
with their initiates that threaten legal action should the materials
become publicly available. As I said, I do not want, nor can I
afford, a legal battle with Daniel Stone, WIlliam Barden, David
Bersson, Ray Eales, Paolo Manini et al. I have a life to live outside
of the courts. This even includes me giving the material to someone
and them making it available. The materials are therefore not being
distributed outside of the UR-O.T.O. and sister organizations.
We have actually removed the rituals of other orders etc from our
archives because of the recent hacking by Mark Sawyer, this includes
the SOTO rituals, Crowley rituals etc.