From: ... 93 23, I was going to tell you by personal mail, but given the circumstances, I tell you now. The only problem Ive gotMessage 1 of 33 , Jun 29, 2001View SourceFrom: <thee_process23@...>
> --- In thelema93-l@y..., "Igg" <igghdrasil@h...> wrote:93
> Answering to a man who as he say,
> > ISNT THELEMITE, maybe you like spend your time, me dont :)
> I never said that. I said i was never a member of thelemic orders.
> But if you have a problem with that or another concern of mine
> perhaps you should like to do me a favor and say so. I remember you
> writing that you were a member of a number of groups and left you
> with bad memories. Perhaps I am smarter to avoid them altogether!
23, I was going to tell you by personal mail, but given the
circumstances, I tell you now. The only problem Ive got with you is what I
think you spend many energy with Thelemic questions, and Im asking myself if
it is only an empty and nosense desire of war. You say to me, answering my
asking, that you arent member of any Thelemic group, just a few of friends
with common interests, and Crowley is just one of them. Those are your
words. Maybe Im wrong understanding your words or maybe you have expressed
If I ever disturbed you, excuse moi
My engliz is horrible now, im tired. I like fighting from time to
time, but in a honky-tonk with any animal, I have lost the liking for the
dialectical fights, so nobody counts with me for it
Let me dedicate a song to my fellow Eric, this is for ya and all the
good rebs :)
Up the Gods, D.A.S.
Have you ever seen the beauty of the hills of Carolina
Or the sweetness of the grass in Tennessee
And Lord I cant make any change
All I can do is write it in a song
I can see the concrete slowly creeping
Lord take me and mine before it comes
Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law. Argue for your limitations and sure enough they are yours. Love is the law, love under will. Bliss: AlamantraMessage 33 of 33 , Jul 2, 2001View SourceDo what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.
Argue for your limitations and sure enough they are yours.
Love is the law, love under will.
----- Original Message -----
From: Akingu/9 *
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 7:52 PM
Subject: Re: [t93] Re: Thelemic Metaphysics
>From: "Bobby Shiflett" <alamantra93@...>
> Why does ignorance and illiteracy mean that they should not be
>respected? Enlightenment, I thought, breeds tolerance.
Quit thinking and experience it. You'll become enlightened. Those who
do not respect themselves, to learn, to Become... well, "nuff said.
Tolerance is another word for patience. Don't have it. Tough noogies.
> This sounds like hubris to me. Why should they be slaughtererd if they
>are less diverse in intellect, more closed about religious and spiritual
To weed out the weaklings and to strengthen the intellectual and
spiritual strain. Slaughtered could be interpreted in many meanings and I'm
sure you took it to the extreme. I wouldn't kill them. Just make them
The Book of the Law makes three points clear: 1.Compassion is the vice of
kings and 2. these vices should not be veiled in virtuous words and 3. that
our "vices are my service." (...nor do I demand aught in sacrafice).
> If ...and if ...
Blah! Blah! Blah! What if, what if, what if? Fuck what ifs!
Fuck Jesus! Be a nice guy. Turn the other cheek. 10 commandmaents.
Golden Rule. BAHLASTI! OMPEHDA!
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]