Together, they have a nice ring: Aum! let it fill me!  Aum! let it kill me!  FWIW by EQ11: fill 45: 45 & not & be A worm, a a scholar a foulMessage 1 of 10 , Apr 18View SourceTogether, they have a nice ring:
Aum! let it fill me! 
Aum! let it kill me! 
FWIW by EQ11:
A worm, a
shall hang a
O God, how
old, and was
Pa, Sa, Ga.
5=6, 0=0: Asar, as
as an old
dogs, as a
On 04/18/2013 01:33 AM, Jake Stratton-Kent wrote:
> kill as opposed to fill likely involves AC's extreme & simplistic take
> on 'Buddhist' ego death; thence to other half baked stuff. Whether
> Thelema should perpetuate such notions is a moot point, personally I
> doubt it. Occult masochism of this kind has certainly been overdone
> and controversial in the past, and of course the guru's ego was not
> notably effected. While an element of ego loss is part and parcel of
> yogic and other results, textually the light *consuming* 'me' implies
> such notions perfectly adequately, while 'filling' implies an inner
> transformation more mystic than masochistic.
This email is an expression of opinion. No warranty of accuracy
for any statement herein is offered. Nothing herein should be
interpreted as fact. At best it might be construed as resembling
rampant speculation. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion
of the author, those quoted or any other particular person, group
or organization. For entertainment purposes only. Void where
prohibited, taxed or licensed. Your mileage may vary. You have
Thelema Frater Jake, Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law. ... Please tell me who AaaK was? Love is the Law, Love under Will. ALWays, Soror BinahMessage 1 of 10 , Apr 18View SourceThelema Frater Jake,
Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.
> is a monstrous crock; down toPlease tell me who AaaK was?
> switching the genders of AaaK's parents
Love is the Law, Love under Will.
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com] On
Behalf Of Jake Stratton-Kent
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 1:02 AM
Subject: Re: [t93] Kill versus Fill
>My finger landed on the first words of verse 1:54funnily enough that's where I opened mine
> "Change not as much as the style of a letter..."
> So my response to this Rorshach test is exactly that.The pseudo-exegetical process involved in the change sounds dubious;
> I'm interested to hear others' opinions, and what implications they think
> this change might have, if it indeed is put into effect.
not that I've ever been specially impressed at OTO's mechanistic
efforts in that line. Re AC's input, his take on the Egyptian priest
(as for instance in 'Across the gulf') is a monstrous crock; down to
switching the genders of AaaK's parents.
I'd be happier with both versions doing the rounds, 'fill' in AL and
'kill' in supplementary texts; as has been the case up to now. I've
said 'Aum! let it fill me!' for decades and will continue to do so.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]