--- In email@example.com
, "Tom Chaudoin" <taammuz@...>
> Of the various 'childs of thy bowels" the best candidates in my
> Jim Lees, Joel Love, and R. Leo Gillis. The amount of staggering
> men have unearthed in the last 30 years concerning an English
> if it is examined beyond cursory dismissal by the orthodoxy etc.
> lend great creedence to the idea that Crowley was not the author.
> items are self-evident, and are in no wise referenced by Crowley at
> in his life. Nor is there any other evidence that he knew of them.
Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.
In response to this nomination, I will reply in the affirmative.
I am a Child of the Prophet; a magical heir of the Beast 666.
The Children of the Prophet are those who continue the work of their
Part of this work is the employment of the Trigrammaton Qabalah to
elucidate the mysteries of the Book of the Law. This Qabalah comes to
us directly from the prophet himself; it is not an invention of mine.
It is my position that Liber AL refers to the Prophet in this verse:
"Thou shalt obtain the order & value of the English Alphabet; thou
shalt find new symbols to attribute them unto."
In response to this directive found in AL 2:55, the Old (i.e.
original) Comment on this verse by the Prophet says quite
succinctly: "Done. See Liber Trigrammaton."
He is here referring to the English letter-attributions appended to
the Trigrams of Liber Trigrammaton, and published in the Equinox in
1912. This Holy Book was described by A.C. as "the foundation of the
highest theoretical qabalah."
The plain fact is that this verse has been fulfilled for over 93
years. All other attempts to do so have been done by those unaware
that the key had already been discovered.
Thelemites interested in this area have two choices; either one
accepts the prophet's word on the subject, as we are directed to do
in the Tunis Comment, or look elsewhere for the answer.
"All questions of the Law are to be decided only by appeal to my
writings, each for himself." The question of verse 2:55 is decided
by just such an appeal.
It is true that in the New Comment, A.C. expressed doubts about any
merit in the Trigrammaton Qabalah. But this was because he had not
ascertained the correct value for the Trigrams. This is not
surprising, since counting in a different number-base would not
likely have occurred to him; (it didn't occur to Norman Mudd or
So the Prophet did exactly as prophesied; "solve the first half of
the equation; leave the second unattacked." He solved the Order of
the alphabet, but he left the Value of the alphabet alone.
Past claimants to the position of `magical heir' have all used as
their bona fides some type of cipher devised by their own ingenium,
rather than going back to the source.
In my case, I have devised no gematria or literal qabalah of my own.
I have, rather, used the text left to us by the Prophet, and have
discovered therein the Key to the Law itself.
My discoveries and methodologies have all been built on this
foundation of Liber XXVII.
If the claim that Liber AL was written by a non-human intelligence
can be proven at all, the most likely method is the encoding of a
mathematical formula so precise, and yet so intricate, that it could
not have been devised by a human mind, least of all the Scribe's.
The Trigrammaton Qabalah provides exactly such a proof.
The mathematics involved in this proof are no more complicated than
basic arithmetic. This is not to say that there are no higher maths
involved in Liber AL, but that the core proofs are readily accessible
to a person of average intelligence.
I will not detail all these proofs here; they can be found in the
Holycram archives, in thumbnail form on Lashtal.com, in-depth at
Trigrammaton.net, and in the ongoing research published in the
LiveJournal of Threefold31.
In this forum I will only state the most obvious points.
The Book of the Law as published in English, and known as Liber AL
vel Legis sub figura CCXX, can be summed up using the Base 3 values
of the Trigrams attributed by the Prophet. This `global sum' is the
The numerical characteristics of this number are quite profound. One
of the most obvious is that it can be factored such that 267,696 = 11
x 156 x 156.
For the purposes here, there are 6 different ways this number can be
generated; four of them occur in the text of the Law itself, and two
of them occur in the Trigram sequence of Liber XXVIII independent of
any gematria values whatsoever.
The first 27 numerically-valued characters of Liber CCXX can generate
The 28 characters of the Cipher in AL 2:76 can generate this number.
The final verse of Liber AL can generate this number.
The number-words in verse AL 1:46 can generate this number.
The (non-linear) Trigram sequence of Liber XXVII can generate this
The sequence of Antigram-pairs in base 3 can also generate this
So far, no other gematria-value for the English Alphabet has
The prophet said that the Cipher of AL 2:76 appeared to be a
qabalistic test for any who claim to be his magical heir. But he did
not say if passing this test was necessary or merely sufficient. In
other words, anyone who solves the riddle may or may not be the heir,
but can one be the heir if they have not solved the riddle? And if
there is only one heir, is there is only one solution?
I have solved the Cipher and discovered the Key of it all, and on
that basis claim the status of a child of the prophet.
But there is more than one Child mentioned in Liber AL. And there is
the one to follow, and the one who cometh after, and the One who was
Achad, and all these should not be confused.
So there, I've said it in public.
Let the vitriol flow to my name.
Love is the law, love under will.
R. Leo Gillis
Lux Et Obscuritas 8'3'