On Sat, 4 Dec 2004, james john vandenbusch wrote:
> the great work is satannic in it's truest sense,since it's aspirants
> must rid themselves of the slave and common folk's mentality of
> subservience to class and distinction's of fool's and there folly.
The irony, of course, is that blind, self-serving Satanism is just as
foolish. Exchanging one trap for another is no enlightenment.
> aleister crowley did indeed identify aiwas as shaitan but never as
> lucifer or new age frauds of blavatsky or waite.
To Crowley, the name of the god(s) in question didn't mean much, given
they are revealed to all be the same in Liber 228 and elsewhere.
>the O.T.O is silent
> on these matters since they are a thelemic masonic order of irregular
The O.T.O. is silent on these matters because beyond mundane fraternity,
there is really only one bag lunch - they don't care about what's on the
second or third platter or on the menu down the street.