Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003, Frater 232 wrote:
> Here you imply that you own [a] truth to the 'intent of the system,'
Nice straw man. Real cute. I say no such thing.
> yet fail to realize that it is your own truth. The fact that you've
> already defined my system and labeled wrong, not to mention the
> allusion that I need conform to your truth speaks volumes.
Apparently I needn't actually say anything here. You'll just create my
conditions and respond to them to boot.
> I think it far more revealing of your present condition in the
> exploit than mine. What say you, a mirror game? Really.
> >This isn't about "Whip out your dick and compare sizes to divy
> up Europe" here..
> Yet, this is what you are doing.
Straw man again.
> >- it's about private attainments..
> 6=5 isn't private, private.
Out of context. Cute.
> >That said, I don't agree with your interpretations of the 8=3 one
> bit here either:
> Nor do you have to.
No, I apparently don't have to respond or do anything, since you'll just
project my opinion for me.
> >if anything, the Oath is supreme attachment to a point of near
> Nor do I have to buy into this uneduacted materialist tripe.
> So you hadn't found the error until I pointed it out to you then. Do
> you know it's obvious.
Straw man yet again.
> My information was implied, read into it or not.
There's a lot of implication going on.
> You'd do best to get over yourself. You haven't set foot on the path
And when questioned, like all the other supposed leaders, you go for straw
man and the tired 'haven't done a thing.'
Love is the law, love under Will.
luciferchrist.com .`. realm-of-shade.com
"There just comes a point at which I must sit, slack-jawed, and marvel at
the stupidity of occultists." - God